Mysterious Rods...What are they?

viking · 01-16-2010, 03:03 PM

I've seen videos of these before...what are they??

Mikagon · 01-21-2010, 03:31 AM

At first I was having prejudices about that they were extradimensional and chemtrails were being made to kill these beings. But my best prediction is that they are some osrt of dragonfly, a kind of insect/bug animal you can say and the way they flip their wings makes them look like a rod like a beebird you know but you can never be sure.

trainedobserver · 01-21-2010, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viking

I've seen videos of these before...what are they??

Many of these things are bugs and birds.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEurk1JPo-w

gscraig · 01-21-2010, 04:12 PM

Many of these things are bugs and birds.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This doesn't come close to explaining a lot of footage taken of these rods. I will give credence to maybe a shot or two in terms of being insects/birds, but that's where I hold up my STOP sign. :-)
Considering this experiment happened to air on the History Channel, tells me something is being defused, not explained.

trainedobserver · 01-21-2010, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gscraig

Many of these things are bugs and birds.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This doesn't come close to explaining a lot of footage taken of these rods. I will give credence to maybe a shot or two in terms of being insects/birds, but that's where I hold up my STOP sign. :-)
Considering this experiment happened to air on the History Channel, tells me something is being defused, not explained.

Well, these things can be reproduced, like the 'tether incident' type UFOs and others. Believe what you want. The truth of the matter that Digital photography can produce some strange images that are products or artifacts of the process shouldn't be ignored if you are actually concerned with the truth.

Rods Explained

Camera artifacts of the type found in STS-75 tether footage.

gscraig · 01-29-2010, 04:03 AM

Well let's take a gander.

Can we begin with the Tether incident. I never mentioned it, and because I have a couple of unanswered questions related to that personally, I would not have mentioned it. Therefore, no comment on that topic.

Now, let's move on to the Rods. Most of the difference in proof of our opinions is actually addressed in the first two minutes of the video.

Elongation and duplication of objects at high speeds is the proposed premise of the video's first attempt to dismiss Rod's being...well, Rods. It proclaims that objects moving at a very high speed tend to take up dual fields (or 2 frames for a rough example) instead of one, due to elongation which causes the object to appear longer and differently than what is actually there (or seen).

Let's begin;
1) After proclaiming the above, the video then goes into it's first demonstration of it's theory on why and how this happens. The demonstration is using a paint ball being fired in front of a camera. However, (to avoid typing each phase)as the narrator clearly states, the "experiment is not a complete success", the paint ball did not elongate into 2 fields, but remained in one. The narrator goes on to say this is because "THE PAINT BALL WAS TOO FAST TO BE CAPTURED". <----This was one of the original understandings and fascination with the rods that were being filmed to begin with. At this point of the video, the entire argument or claim of evidence has crumbled like a house of cards....in my opinion.

I won't dismantle the rest of the video's credibility, and some of it's legitimate imagery disputes (insects) that still pales in comparison to some actual rod footage. Here are the other factors I consider in reaching my maintained "belief", as it was referenced...

2.) There is footage of very fast Rods leaving our atmosphere with a presumed aim at unidentified objects. As a result, the UFO's quickly maneuvered out of it's path and out of harms way. This immediately dismantles the insect/bug theory for they do not have the ability to withstand gravity, yet alone, survive out of our atmosphere to project as a fast moving blur aimed at a HUGE object. This also further dismantles the elongated theory of the object being something else, and harmless.

3) You have to ponder, who and why did someone decide to spend the time, money, and other resources to disprove the rods that were not common knowledge to the general public? To furhter that questioning, they ironically managed to conveniently have it aired on the History Channel???

4) There are also a couple of questions that are posted in the comments section below the video that really expands more on this than what I've expressed thus far.

Again, I think some of the video does explain away some things that have been, filmed, but others it again....Does not come close.

TraineeHuman · 01-29-2010, 06:38 AM

I've read material on the internet in the past from various sources regarding the ETs who look a bit like tadpoles and are quite tiny in size (maybe an inch long). They apparently live in bases at the bottom of the oceans. The rods look the right shape and size to be the same as in other photos I have seen of their spacecraft -- which seem to be very fast and very sophisticated, and based on anti-gravity etc.

01-16-2010, 03:03 PM	#1
viking Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 1,709	Mysterious Rods...What are they? I've seen videos of these before...what are they??

01-21-2010, 03:31 AM	#2
Mikagon Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 8	Re: Mysterious Rods...What are they? At first I was having prejudices about that they were extradimensional and chemtrails were being made to kill these beings. But my best prediction is that they are some osrt of dragonfly, a kind of insect/bug animal you can say and the way they flip their wings makes them look like a rod like a beebird you know but you can never be sure.

01-21-2010, 04:12 PM	#4
gscraig Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 335	Re: Mysterious Rods...What are they? Many of these things are bugs and birds. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This doesn't come close to explaining a lot of footage taken of these rods. I will give credence to maybe a shot or two in terms of being insects/birds, but that's where I hold up my STOP sign. :-) Considering this experiment happened to air on the History Channel, tells me something is being defused, not explained.

01-29-2010, 04:03 AM	#6
gscraig Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 335	Re: Mysterious Rods...What are they? Well let's take a gander. Can we begin with the Tether incident. I never mentioned it, and because I have a couple of unanswered questions related to that personally, I would not have mentioned it. Therefore, no comment on that topic. Now, let's move on to the Rods. Most of the difference in proof of our opinions is actually addressed in the first two minutes of the video. Elongation and duplication of objects at high speeds is the proposed premise of the video's first attempt to dismiss Rod's being...well, Rods. It proclaims that objects moving at a very high speed tend to take up dual fields (or 2 frames for a rough example) instead of one, due to elongation which causes the object to appear longer and differently than what is actually there (or seen). Let's begin; 1) After proclaiming the above, the video then goes into it's first demonstration of it's theory on why and how this happens. The demonstration is using a paint ball being fired in front of a camera. However, (to avoid typing each phase)as the narrator clearly states, the "experiment is not a complete success", the paint ball did not elongate into 2 fields, but remained in one. The narrator goes on to say this is because "*THE PAINT BALL WAS TOO FAST TO BE CAPTURED*". <----This was one of the original understandings and fascination with the rods that were being filmed to begin with. At this point of the video, the entire argument or claim of evidence has crumbled like a house of cards....in my opinion. I won't dismantle the rest of the video's credibility, and some of it's legitimate imagery disputes (insects) that still pales in comparison to some actual rod footage. Here are the other factors I consider in reaching my maintained "belief", as it was referenced... 2.) There is footage of very fast Rods leaving our atmosphere with a presumed aim at unidentified objects. As a result, the UFO's quickly maneuvered out of it's path and out of harms way. This immediately dismantles the insect/bug theory for they do not have the ability to withstand gravity, yet alone, survive out of our atmosphere to project as a fast moving blur aimed at a HUGE object. This also further dismantles the elongated theory of the object being something else, and harmless. 3) You have to ponder, who and why did someone decide to spend the time, money, and other resources to disprove the rods that were not common knowledge to the general public? To furhter that questioning, they ironically managed to conveniently have it aired on the History Channel??? 4) There are also a couple of questions that are posted in the comments section below the video that really expands more on this than what I've expressed thus far. Again, I think some of the video does explain away some things that have been, filmed, but others it again....Does not come close.

01-29-2010, 06:38 AM	#7
TraineeHuman Avalon Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 174	Re: Mysterious Rods...What are they? I've read material on the internet in the past from various sources regarding the ETs who look a bit like tadpoles and are quite tiny in size (maybe an inch long). They apparently live in bases at the bottom of the oceans. The rods look the right shape and size to be the same as in other photos I have seen of their spacecraft -- which seem to be very fast and very sophisticated, and based on anti-gravity etc.