|
![]() |
#26 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At the doors of perception
Posts: 2,135
|
![]()
This is the same hoax as the african pi rates
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Those daurn old nukes,i mean dukes causing hazzard again. ![]() Last edited by 777 The Great Work; 12-02-2008 at 12:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 114
|
![]()
No confirmation on any controlled nuclear detentions? Not matter what, that many earthquakes of that size so concentrated in that particular spot is fairly peculiar...
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/zoom/eve...24&lat=79.6563 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
the simple fact is that there were NO NUKES exploded in the canadian arctic. the area in question is inhabited by canadians and has a lot of gas and oil exploration. don't you think that the folks in the neighbourhood woulda noticed??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 58
|
![]()
May be it was "the Mother Bomb "that Russia possess and it is not nuclear.They can be registered on sismographe.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 58
|
![]()
Correction:"The Mother of All Bomb"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
i think that is even less likely that the russians are detonating anything in the canadian arctic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,201
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 377
|
![]()
Funny how these openings to the hollow earth are at the poles where nobody goes. Keeps the "mystery" alive I suppose. Very convenient.
As for exploding 9 nukes to seal the entrance to hollow earth, probably a good idea, because if you seal it, it will stop 100 billion trillion gallons of Arctic Ocean from pouring down the hole. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 39
|
![]()
OK, well firstly, Canada is a non-nuclear nation; it isn't legal for anyone including our own government to possess nukes... not that that's stopping 'em.
I think that people have some misconceptions about where the Inuit people live... certainly there are settlements above the Arctic Circle, but nobody lives at the North Pole per se. The Quikiqtaaluk region extends northward from Baffin Island, and the landmass reaches about 83 degrees N. However, the northernmost Inuit community is Grise Fiord at about 75 degrees N, population: approximately 100 people. There aren't too many people at or near the north pole to confirm or deny any sort of activity, nuclear or otherwise. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
if you read the article, you would see that the explosions were sup[posedly near banks island. there is a settlement on banks island. the article is just plain stupid. it makes the canadian government look stupider than they really are. the nukes were supposedly exploded in holes ten kilometers deep (6 miles). i'm not sure where some othese people get this sh*t. obviously, the writer is making it up as he goes along. canada is becoming increasingly protective of arctic sovereignty. this simply could not happen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: I live in Canada. http://ipower.ning.com/forum/topics/did-they-nuke-the-arctic-bush
Posts: 5
|
![]()
I joined this forum so that I could post a link to another site where we are following this topic, it would be great to get more information about what exactly happened, but the blasts HAVE been confirmed from more than one source.
http://ipower.ning.com/forum/topics/...he-arctic-bush |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
i have checked out your link, however, it's just a re-hash of the link in the original post in this thread. it just isn't believable or well sourced or reliable. nine drilled underwater holes, miles deep; nine nukes on canadian territory; a settlement on banks island, near the site...and no one heard or saw anything?? the net is overflowing with bogus alarming stories. this is one of them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne Florida
Posts: 109
|
![]() Quote:
They have blown up hundreds of nukes all around the world that YOU would never have known about there is a good movie called the nuke cafe about all the testing they did in space and out in the oceans not to mention the ones in russia you never hear of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: great northern boreal forest
Posts: 440
|
![]()
whether or not i am aware of all nuclear tests is not the issue. the area in question is in canada. canada is a non-nuclear country. our laws prohibit nukes on canadian soil. that is the issue. we are not talking about the u.s. ot russia and their nuclear programs. we are discussing canada.
the ecidence that supports these nuclear detonations is flimsy at best. there is far more reason to believe that they DID NOT occur that that they did. nine nuke blast in eighteen hours would not go undetected by ALL canadian monitors. this is an area where there is canadian oil exploration. if they DID occur, there would be some canadian confirmation, and hell to pay in parliment. nukes are illegal on canadian soil. there has never been a nuclear blast in canada. full stop. from you position in florida, you are hardly in a position to dispute that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|