|
|
Project Avalon General Discussion Finding safe places, information and resources for building communities, site suggestions. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#51 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: OC/CALIFORNIA
Posts: 587
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,709
|
![]()
Not sure where to place this post but I am sure the Moderaters will sort it.. {sorted}
Anyway I am at crossroads and thought I would get some feedback.... I have been following George Green for a while now and have read all his books...at the moment I am reading 'Handbook for a new Paradigm' for the 3rd time. I admire his work and his commitment and spreading the word to mankind. However I am still not sure about his total belief that we are heading for a 3rd world war with catastrophic consequences. (apparantly we have missed the boat with our collective energy force to change the world!!). Have we?? There are some groups that have said we are on a different time line and that this will not happen...ect etc Also the other groups have suggested that the ETs will not EVER let this happen and have on several occasions put a block with there advanced technology...ect etc..we all know we are being watched...would they let this happen?? What are your thoughts??? viking Last edited by Anchor; 11-14-2008 at 11:00 AM. Reason: Moved post |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 375
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have the feeling that a lot of provoking is going on. Ossetia, cross-border attacks in Pakistan, Syria etc. And I am really amazed by the 'controlled' and not 'outraged' reactions so far which prevented the ignition of any war. I have the feeling it's due to the awareness by other involved countries as well as awareness by patriotic elements within the pentagon. Yesterday I was watching the first part of Ian Lungold's video (explanation of the Mayan Calendar). He explains that it's about evolution. I hope that we're, due to the awakening, far beyond the blunt action-reaction level. And hopefully David Icke's "problem-reaction-solution" will diminish soon as well. E.g. in a Dutch newspaper they announced that new software was able to show more details of a picture and that they could actually look inside the cockpit of a 9/11 airplane (showing a dead co-pilot). I was happy to see from over 60 reader reactions nobody was buying into this. People were even very angry that they really were thinking that people would believe this ! The thing I want to have feedback on is what George Green is talking about when mentioning the red/blue tinkling of stars actually being spaceships monitoring us. I don't know how to explain it exactly but I think it's more likely due to atmospheric conditions ... Especially the stars lower at the horizon (I think this is called low inclination) show this effect and the ones straight up don't ... Although I must admit that at my location the skies are pretty clear from time to time while the phenomenon shows. And if George is right there would also be more ships than stars. Besides the fact that they are as stationary as stars. If I am right on this it shows that not everything he tells us is correct ! Cheers |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Southern England
Posts: 458
|
![]()
I'm pretty much with you on all that, Anchor.
>>"If I am right on this it shows that not everything he tells us is correct !" - how could it be? A friend of mine said 'if he told you to jump off a cliff....then would you?' The answer has to be No. I think you just have to keep cross referencing it all. they are absolutely marvellous works, although i agree again with Anchor that some of it fails the internal resonance test. Still thinking...Still reading....Still feeling out all available info with my head and my heart...Still not worried. I gave in and listened to the recent interview - so weird and at odds with the books. How many ounces of silver? And for what? That's the old paradigm, no? Hmmm. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|