Hi there,
Why would you want to take religion away from a person?
Not everyone is at the same place within the time of their personal evolution. People need the support of their religion for the time they need it.
Religion has been a strong regulatory force to civilize a planet that would otherwise have destroyed itself long ago. Even though if yes, I know, religion has been the base for much pain and lies. But the lies come from beyond material man. And the religious are lied to according to their personal need for experience, like those who are beyond religion are lied to according to their personal need for experience.
And that will remain until we, as individuals, are beyond experience to enter evolution and eventually to enter yet another cycle.
Richard T. is expressing great gnostic wisdom here and displays historical nous and synthesis in his statements.
Religion is simply a label for community and the form of a collective enclosure, say a church or house or temple.
As said, without the association of 'religion' with some form of 'communal spirit', the 'mental confusions' of the general populance in groups, clans and individuations would have resulted in even greater self-destruction (due to lack of a unified consistent modus operandi for the 'thinking' about things); than has become effectualized in the 'control mechanics' implemented by the 'rulers and authorities' of those organized religions.
And the astral disembodied intelligences are coupled to the physical planes by necessity to allow the etheric and 'divine' planes to penetrate back into the physical and following the construction of the descent (through the 'fall') originally.
The 'troubles' of a mentally maturing humanity are however always physically implemented by the humans themselves, albeit mentally engaged by and with the astral sentiences or ETs.
These ETs however 'draw' their energy as the IMAGINED thoughtforms IMAGED by the 3D humans. This fact then intrinsically forms partnerships and relationships between the 3D humans and the 4D ETs.
So, we must respect people's right to religion.
Nothing is unknown. But information is not given freely.
Fear is the sole weapon that death has over man. And it is through fear that they possess his mind.
Yes, this can be technically ascertained in the modular duality of superstring couplings forming higher dimensional supermembranes.
There are ony two logical statements required to establish a 1st order polarisation or duality in the lower dimensions.
The two statements are: LOVE LOVE = FEAR FEAR and LOVE FEAR = FEAR LOVE.
The prior statement monadizes or unifies the uncoupled polarity of LOVE versus FEAR in its doubling.
To FEAR FEAR means never to be afraid and to LOVE LOVE means to be In LOVE with LOVE itself.
The latter statement is selfexplicatory, as to FEAR LOVE is to Live in FEAR and to LOVE FEAR is to desire (or feed on as the astral coupling) the experience of FEAR.
More rigorously, this can be defined in a vibratory high energy quantum superstring in 10 dimensions characterising the LOVE Logistics and coupled in Modular Duality to a FEAR characterizing winded (serpentine) low energy quantum superstring in 10D.
Through the modular quantum entanglement however, the 10D individuated halves of superstring become enabled to construct a 11-dimensional supermembrane so extending the dimensional density continuum (metric) by one orthogonalized dimension.
In death, there is a loss of consciousness as we know it while incarnated. It is not an absence of consciousness but a consciousness of another order. It is an active memory principle that is disconnected from the worlds of light.
Indeed, this 'alter consciousness' refers to the release of the 'encapsulated' wavefunction of the winded superstring modality from the 'body prison' AS a vibratory superstring modality.
The problem is that this modus operandi also DECOUPLES the superstrings and so enforces the 'atomic decay' of the previous body gestalt or morphogenetic form.
So the Universal Logos has formed a BRIDGE of 11D encompassment, which will ALLOW the individual 'resurrections' tthrough and by this 'Logos Bridge' or Portal or Stargate.
It is only within matter that the connection can be made, until a body, other than the astral body, lets call it the mental body, has been completed to recuperate the full energy of the memory of the experience that we call the soul. That mental plane is the place to which the bridge leads to.
This is a wonderful summary of what I have described more technically in the above paragraph. The mental plane of Richard T. is the wave catchment of the previous particularised 3D body consciousness as a 'higherD' consciousness. This also can be defined in technical terms (http://tonyb.freeyellow.com/id185.html).
We can lead ourselves from that plane but not from this plane. What people have been calling the 'higher self'. But that is not the wishful ego.
Iow the aspirant is required to work from a higherD perception. Aurobindo (with Mirra Alfassa) has termed this the 'supermind' in the supramentalization of matter and this can also be termed the awakening of the human superconsciousness, which demands its activation from the unified higher-dimensional plane.
What would you say it was that the Nazareen talked about when he referred to his father?
Yes, the 'Father' is the Prime Source who utilizes the 11D as a MIRROR to selfinteract from the nospacetimematter of the VOID=ETERNITY of 12D with the two superstrings of the 10D within the spacetimematter. Again, this is technically defined and so physicalized in all dimensions by and through the Universal Logos.
People don't read by vibration. They read by memorial references. So, they get things explained for them, instead of allowing their own spirit to let them see outside for the forms afforded by thoughts. And thoughts are always restricted, adjusted to memorial matter, therefore the astral sphere.
02-22-2010, 10:02 AM
Re: What was Jesus then?
Threaded Mode