Obama to Use EPA to Declare CO2 a Dangerous Pollutant

Northern Boy · 12-07-2009, 08:28 PM

This dangerous gas that all plant life requires to exist will soon be slapped on the pollutant list an be reduced world wide causing the possible extinction of many plants. I will put this in here for the benefit of those who wish to avoid reading negative information.

WARNING read no further least your eyes fall out of their sockets this website has been know to cause some human beings to turn into to puddles on the spot!! WARNING

http://www.infowars.com/obama-to-use...ous-pollutant/

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
December 7, 2009

Obama and crew will not wait for the outcome of Copenhagen or the passage of the Waxman-Markey climate bill, predicted for 2010 at the earliest. Obama will declare carbon dioxide a dangerous pollutant this week.

Obama will trek to Copenhagen on December 18 and attempt to convince the one-worlders and their cult of green that he is serious about the climate change agenda.

The Environmental Protection Agency has declared carbon dioxide dangerous and this will probably result in the government requiring businesses that emit carbon dioxide and five other “greenhouse gases” to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions. Congress need not be consulted and no law need be enacted.

An EPA “endangerment finding” would allow the federal agency to use the federal Clean Air Act to regulate carbon-dioxide emissions

The EPA ruling and enforcement “could result in a top-down command-and-control regime that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every major construction and renovation project,” U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said in a statement. “The devil will be in the details, and we look forward to working with the government to ensure we don’t stifle our economic recovery.”

“EPA action to regulate emissions could affect the U.S. economy more directly, and more quickly, than any global deal inked in the Danish capital, where no binding agreement is expected,” opines The Wall Street Journal.

Congressional Republicans are up in arms over the EPA “endangerment” ruling and have called on the agency to withdraw it. They have cited the fraudsters at the Climatic Research Unit of the U.K.’s University of East Anglia as an example that man-made climate change needs to be investigated and junk science cannot be allowed to stand without challenge.

EPA action would signal to the United Nations, the Copenhagen globalists and their phalanx of NGOs that Obama is serious about eliminating carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and sending western civilization back to the Dark Ages. Obama will trek to the conference on December 18 and attempt to convince the one-worlders and their cult of green that he is serious about the climate change agenda.

The EPA decision to categorize carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant is junk science manifest, but then the idea is not to save the planet, but rather use this fake science to impose the globalist agenda on humanity — from a massive cap and trade derivatives scheme, to globalist taxation and finally a culling of the herd. It’s no secret the major players behind one-world globalism are eugenicists.

“CO2 is not a pollutant. In simple terms, CO2 is plant food,” notes John R. Christy, professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Alabama. “The green world we see around us would disappear if not for atmospheric CO2. These plants largely evolved at a time when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was many times what it is today. Indeed, numerous studies indicate the present biosphere is being invigorated by the human-induced rise of CO2. In and of itself, therefore, the increasing concentration of CO2 does not pose a toxic risk to the planet.”

In fact, as S. Fred Singer, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia has noted, an increase in C02 would raise GNP and therefore average income. “It’s axiomatic that bureaucracies always want to expand their scope of operations. This is especially true of EPA, which is primarily a regulatory agency,” writes Singer.

The EPA is may soon be tasked with regulating life in the United States at the behest of a coterie of globalists who are keen to limit economic and industrial activity and check the growth of the herd which they despise and want to scale back to 500 million, as they have proudly announced on the Georgia Guidestones

12-07-2009, 08:28 PM	#1
Northern Boy Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: On this Rock Posts: 1,390	Obama to Use EPA to Declare CO2 a Dangerous Pollutant This dangerous gas that all plant life requires to exist will soon be slapped on the pollutant list an be reduced world wide causing the possible extinction of many plants. I will put this in here for the benefit of those who wish to avoid reading negative information. WARNING read no further least your eyes fall out of their sockets this website has been know to cause some human beings to turn into to puddles on the spot!! WARNING http://www.infowars.com/obama-to-use...ous-pollutant/ Kurt Nimmo Infowars December 7, 2009 Obama and crew will not wait for the outcome of Copenhagen or the passage of the Waxman-Markey climate bill, predicted for 2010 at the earliest. Obama will declare carbon dioxide a dangerous pollutant this week. Obama will trek to Copenhagen on December 18 and attempt to convince the one-worlders and their cult of green that he is serious about the climate change agenda. The Environmental Protection Agency has declared carbon dioxide dangerous and this will probably result in the government requiring businesses that emit carbon dioxide and five other “greenhouse gases” to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions. Congress need not be consulted and no law need be enacted. An EPA “endangerment finding” would allow the federal agency to use the federal Clean Air Act to regulate carbon-dioxide emissions The EPA ruling and enforcement “could result in a top-down command-and-control regime that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every major construction and renovation project,” U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas Donohue said in a statement. “The devil will be in the details, and we look forward to working with the government to ensure we don’t stifle our economic recovery.” “EPA action to regulate emissions could affect the U.S. economy more directly, and more quickly, than any global deal inked in the Danish capital, where no binding agreement is expected,” opines The Wall Street Journal. Congressional Republicans are up in arms over the EPA “endangerment” ruling and have called on the agency to withdraw it. They have cited the fraudsters at the Climatic Research Unit of the U.K.’s University of East Anglia as an example that man-made climate change needs to be investigated and junk science cannot be allowed to stand without challenge. EPA action would signal to the United Nations, the Copenhagen globalists and their phalanx of NGOs that Obama is serious about eliminating carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and sending western civilization back to the Dark Ages. Obama will trek to the conference on December 18 and attempt to convince the one-worlders and their cult of green that he is serious about the climate change agenda. The EPA decision to categorize carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant is junk science manifest, but then the idea is not to save the planet, but rather use this fake science to impose the globalist agenda on humanity — from a massive cap and trade derivatives scheme, to globalist taxation and finally a culling of the herd. It’s no secret the major players behind one-world globalism are eugenicists. “CO2 is not a pollutant. In simple terms, CO2 is plant food,” notes John R. Christy, professor of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Alabama. “The green world we see around us would disappear if not for atmospheric CO2. These plants largely evolved at a time when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was many times what it is today. Indeed, numerous studies indicate the present biosphere is being invigorated by the human-induced rise of CO2. In and of itself, therefore, the increasing concentration of CO2 does not pose a toxic risk to the planet.” In fact, as S. Fred Singer, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia has noted, an increase in C02 would raise GNP and therefore average income. “It’s axiomatic that bureaucracies always want to expand their scope of operations. This is especially true of EPA, which is primarily a regulatory agency,” writes Singer. The EPA is may soon be tasked with regulating life in the United States at the behest of a coterie of globalists who are keen to limit economic and industrial activity and check the growth of the herd which they despise and want to scale back to 500 million, as they have proudly announced on the Georgia Guidestones Last edited by Northern Boy; 12-07-2009 at 09:44 PM.