Whistleblower intentions called into question here...

[peacelovinman]

I would like your views on this please. I hope my questioning will be taken in the spirit of open mindedness intended.

I believe it is would be very dangerous to believe the witness testimony as representing the whole truth. This article is of particular interest as it specifically mentions Project Camelot and Michael StClair.

http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5259

[milk and honey]

I don't recall the article referring to Michael St Clair or Project camelot. The general subject is definately open to question, yes, and the article is a potential eye opener for anyone who hasn't yet looked at the involvement of decietful terrestrial forces in the whole alien / UFO question. It's essential that everyone (including contactees) stay open to ALL information about aliens and UFOs including sources who are urging caution.

Anyone who is unwilling to hear from these sources, can fall into the same mental trap of unquestioned orthodoxy as fundamentalists always do. The process of HOW communities arrive at our conclusions (on every subject) is just as important as the common beliefs that we form. Because in the end, hopefully, nobody is forced to accept a consensus belief about aliens and UFOs (or anything else for that matter) but everyone must engage the same process. If we keep the PROCESS open and honest then the outcome has a far better chance of reflecting the truth about anything we seek.

For an excellent analysis of the "Overlooked Aspects Of the Alien Presence" see also montalk's article at this link http://montalk.net/notes/overlooked-...alien-presence

I believe it would be hard to find a better analysis written more succinctly than montalk's essay.

[Norval]

Actually, Project Camelot is mentioned a few times in the main article, and St. Clair twice
in posters remarks.

Just do a word search on the page. edit / Find on this page.

[Racsouran]

doubt is a great gift we have, never doubt using it.

[rustanddust]

everything is symbolism....

they always tell us what they will do beforehand, if we could recognize the signs.

Well, I think these people need a right of reply.

A quote from that link:

"This page covers a fair few I gave credit to, like Michael St Clair, John Lear, Project Camelot, Disclosure Project and they’re all connected to the freemasons."

I didn't know Kerry or Bill were Freemasons.

These people need to be careful what they write, if that was written about me I might just take it very seriously and go to a lawyer.

[Love/Light 13]

so what is the point of the article exactly? That ET's are not real, and that this is all part of a masonic/illuminati conspiracy to create a false-flag alien invasion? While disinformation is clearly rampant in this field of study, I find it hard to believe that ALL of the information on Projectcamelot.org and enterprisemission is disinfo.

Does the writer of this post want us to believe that intelligent life from other parts of the galaxy/universe has not visited and contacted the citizens of this planet throughout the ages?

We must study all info with our personal Truth filter, and know that we are the masters of our own destiny........... never let anyone tell you differently.

***********

may WISDOM guide COMPASSION

"out of MANY, we are ONE"

Originally Posted by Tuza

I didn't know Kerry or Bill were Freemasons.

What's wrong with Freemasons?

My point is people should be careful what labels they put on everyone. If someone wrote something about me that was not true, it would depend on how serious it was or what mood I was in on whether I would seek legal counsel. I did not say anything about freemasonry per'se, I just said I didn't know that Kerry and Bill were freemasons, because this person wrote that about St Clair, Lear, Bill and Kerry in that post.

[peacelovinman]

Originally Posted by Tuza

My point is people should be careful what labels they put on everyone. If someone wrote something about me that was not true, it would depend on how serious it was or what mood I was in on whether I would seek legal counsel. I did not say anything about freemasonry per'se, I just said I didn't know that Kerry and Bill were freemasons, because this person wrote that about St Clair, Lear, Bill and Kerry in that post.

My point would be this: what is it that we are being offered here at Avalon?

One thing is the opportunity to meet folks of like mind and discuss this momentus point in our history, which is great.

The other is that we are being asked to buy into belief systems, offered by folks like Michael StClair, David Wilcock, etc. Iis it time we stopped blindly subscribing to belief systems given to us by an external "authority" and take responsibility for our own lives?

We have consented to live in a world where a few people have created a massive system of occult, fictional entities (such as money, economics, jobs, laws, capatalism, communism, politics, etc, etc) to control us and lead us away from the truth. The truth is that we are spiritual beings, created by The Creator (God, Source, Divine etc) and placed on this Earth with everything we need to prosper easily at hand.

The fictional system is to blame for EVERYTHING that is wrong with the world. When we stop subscribing to fictional systems (in whatever form they take), the world will be right and we will take our place once again as co-creators with God on this wonderful planet.

This is what I truly feel and I have only good in mind as I write. Life could be so simple, so beautiful, so joyous if only we could grasp the simplicity of what it would take to bring it about.

[milk and honey]

Originally Posted by Norval

Actually, Project Camelot is mentioned a few times in the main article, and St. Clair twice
in posters remarks.

Just do a word search on the page. edit / Find on this page.

Thanks Norval.. Wasn't saying the references weren't there, just that i didn't recall it. i read the article months ago. Cheers.