Quote:
Originally Posted by weareone
sorry guys but i have to agree with kevin, georges negative view is needed to balance the positive views of others. But will only be embraced by people of a negative polarisation, nit that this is in even the slightest way a problem, as i said there cannot be positive without negative, good without bad, light without dark and ying without yang. Keep vibrating at higher levels. WeR1
|
Isn't this "old paradigm reality"? My understanding is that we are to look beyond all that is known, all that is taught and all that we have been led to believe up to this point. I don't seem to remember any of the Masters we have had in the past (whichever presonage you may choose to endow with that ranking) teaching that we had to have evil to have good? I have to humbly disagree with this. I see no connection in allowing negativity to prevail in any manner or form. Are we not after all trying to create a new reality? In my reality there is no need of negativity. Hopefully I am not alone in this. Surely the new paradigm is to shake out the dross and make way for something so new and so different (so pure) that it will leave even the creators of this new reality awestruck?
ARe we perhaps misinterpreting the meaning of Negative? Yes you need protons to have neutrons but does this in fact transcribe to good and evil? I think not. Good and evil is a choice, not a matter of physics. IMHO anyway.
LL&P