I am well aware of all that you say and whether destruction is good or bad, all right. But you still only argument for the 'negative'. What about the opposite? What justifications do WE have to be wanting to sustain life. I can see that they have an external agenda while we have the internal one. I am not against change and understand that nothing should be feared, but it seems like losing lives on this planet is more like losing potential... and the idea of policing the whole world seems rather impractible compared to teaching everyone to take responsibility of themselves.
The other great discrepancy is however this (and we suck at this, lock ourselves up and know not to share):
Quote:
Originally Posted by 777 The Great Work
...we are dealing with people who know there is no death and it is our fear of death and lack of knowledge that allows them to have power without ethics.
|
Also, I'm hard pressed to think that the PTB are not thinking in polarity. Otherwise I feel like arguing that they wouldn't see enough cause to act as they do.