Well, I'm certainly talking mumbo-jumbo given that I've said I'd read 'Carr' when it should have been 'Watt'. Alan Carr is an English comedien but let's not go there in terms of Freudian slips
I understand the points you are making but I think by generalisations, you might be missing a sort of objectivity here.
I may be wrong but I think its possible we come from the same academic discipline. If this is correct then you will understand when I say that if you start out with a hypothesis you have to test it quite thoroughly before drawing a conclusion. The size of the sample would be important. I'm not sure that stating that the posts here are 'insane mumbo-jumbo' is much of a scientific statement
What are your views on consciousness and psychic experiences?