Quote:
Originally Posted by munkey
a true amd just society would have no rules except for common sense, you can have no one ruler or leader to decide otherwise corruption will always come about, each person should have an equal say and compramise so as there is harmony in the group itself.
collective wisdom should be the goal and wisdom and ethics should be encouraged so science doesn't get free rein.
|
As I see it, if there is a need for a “one person communication” in a tribe system, I think this person more like an elected spokesman for a specific task or question, I think this system has been used before in some tribes. As I understand, the chief of the tribe, was more acting as a spokesman and not a ruler.
If the “three pillars” are in “equal in levels”, we will understand that it is not wise and common sense to put in for example “rambo chips” or rfid chips in people, or give people Aspartame, E621 and so on.
If you adapt the “three pillars” system on an individual, mentioned before, it is not wise to teach a person a lot of technical and scientific knowledge, if the person in question has no knowledge at all about the “individual knowledge” and/or the ”society or interindividual knowledge”, all three levels must be at similar levels. I agree that the most dangerous pillar is, of course, the “scientific or technical” one.
We have to remember we are all “biased” from our present world environment.
Democracy to me is not “majority rules”.
Love, Freedom and Truth
stiros