First, i have a great deal of respect for David and all the other researchers. These people are such incredible sources of knowledge, folks like Icke, Wilcox, Mutwa, Casbolt, Maars, Maxwell and of course Kerry and Bill and so many others. Hat's off!
I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer by a long shot, but here's my take on the 9-sep-08 interview:
I think David places to much importance on what appears to me as pseudo-math, if you will. For instance, he takes a number, divides it by another and then ties some sort of significance to the result. He also mentioned the "bible code" which, to my knowledge (i did some research on this), is a complete fallacy. Mathematicians have done the same thing with Moby Dick and produced similar results.
Here's one example.
Interestingly, David seems to convey that there really is a great significance regarding the outcome of the upcoming US presidential [s]election and the effect it will have on our future. Knowing a bit about governments within governments (secret government), secret societies, bankers, the UN, intel communities, bankers, etc., etc., etc., i wonder how accurate he is -- in other words, what influence do elected officials have on issues that are really important when they're not the ones in control anyway? From my point of view, i see little or no significance as all of the mainstream candidates are tied to the same organizations/corporations/societies that have influenced government for many years. Even if Ron Paul were elected, there is little he could do without the support of Congress, the courts (which are insanely corrupt) and many others.
Truth be told, i think Obama (or "O'drama", as i call him) may be the least of the evils, but i'm tired of having to choose the least evil. I will not vote for him and can see no truth in his claims of "change", especially when i look at his voting record and association with the UN, as well as considering what he has said regarding military force in Iran, Afghanistan and the ME in general. The
Larry Sinclair thing is also an interesting tidbit to me because, if his claims are accurate, and i tend to think they are, this says a lot about Obama's integrity, or lack thereof.
As far as David's thinking that Obama chose Biden to keep his enemies close at hand, i hope he's right, but i see 2 possibilities that seem more likely; 1) Biden was picked for him by the neo-cons and 2) Obama is no different than the rest of the war mongers. I'll go with the latter and hope that i am dead wrong. McCain's VP "choice" is equally interesting.
At any rate, we will be stuck, yet again, with the same people and the same mess. Just because someone doesn't get elected (such as Hillery (read: Hitlery)) doesn't necessarily mean they are less influential. One only needs to poke at the Carlyle Group to see why.
ET's: Man, i have a lot of trouble wrapping my head around this stuff. I can accept that human development was the result of ET influence (including blacks, though David seems to feel they may be the only indignant race on the planet). ET influence makes sense to me for a variety of reasons, but one especially: we simply don't "fit" -- we're the only animal on the planet that is hell bent on destroying everything and are totally out of tune with nature. However, when folks mention the different ET races, ET's in DUMB's, etc., this is where i begin to choke. I'm not saying i refuse to believe, just that it's difficult (haven't done enough homework in this area yet).
Credo Mutwa is a fascinating man to listen to regarding this stuff though. If you haven't seen this interview conducted by David Icke, YOU MUST SEE IT!
As for the bulk of David's testimony however, i tend to agree with him on many points because i've come across many other people and news stories which corroborate what David says. The worst part of the whole thing is how useless i feel in so far as effecting real change, but, then again, maybe we ARE having a dramatic effect because of the ability to publish and share information vie the internet, thus exposing these criminals.
I hope David's cautious optimism is well placed. I would rather we get to pick and choose how we want to organize and meet, rather than being forced to network at a FEMA camp
