Quote:
Originally Posted by StClair
[COLOR="Red"]
..............The 2012 phenomenon is thus "The Big Storm." The rules of the new game are that those who cooperate will survive and those who dont will not, that simple. That is the "Rite of Passage" and the weather phenomenon will take out those who cannot adapt to the new rules of the game, created by Cosmos......................
|
I'm feeling quite intimidated by your apparent reverence Michael. I'll try to overcome this to express myself without reactionary aggression.
The "2012" phenomenon is pretty hard currency around here at Avalon. As there is an unrestricted supply of it also, there is a lot of it being traded here by 'lesser' beings and 'higher' beings alike.
I'll confess that I have powerfully mixed feelings about you. You say "those who cooperate will survive and those who don't will not, that simple". Much of what you say is evidently common sense and universal. Then you really confuse me with astatement like that one. I'm sure that like the rest of us you're not perfect and so a few flaws in your reasoning are excusable. Your term "Radiant Zone" has a very 'positive' implication and quite rightly so. It's evident that people in this world who experience the most quality of life have in some way or other established radiant zones for themselves and others they wish to include.
Because your statement has confused me I've had to take it apart and look at it more critically. The two words that alarm me are "cooperate" and "survive". To a lesser extent the coupling of "that simple" is also alarming.
I'm tempted to leave it at that for now so that you can have a chance to read this deconstruction of your statement and consider it worthy of a response or not. I don't doubt that you are an intelligent enough man not to need my further analysis of the points of interest that I have indicated. And anyway, your expansion would be far more interesting to read than my expansion. It was, after all, you who said this.
It might have been quite off-topic with this but it was in this thread that I found this statement. I have other matters I'd like to clear up with you sometime but they most certainly would be off-topic for this thread.
I appreciate all the Camelot video interviewing. It puts many interesting people into view. I think I understand Kerry's and Bill's reasoning why they generally only ask light weight questions if they even ask questions at all. It's right and respectful to allow the interviewees to initially have their free say. Camelot does that very well.
Thank you all.
norman.