Quote:
Originally Posted by murnut
Maybe it just is what it is....a hacker got caught.
If gary had really seen anything, he would have been eliminated.
All the hype about this case has come from Gary's side.
I have no problem with Gary, but I do have a problem with a distortion of the facts.
Either the US govt can prove the damage, or they can't.
Gary admitted hacking the network.
Why do so many advocate Gary pleading not guilty?
Is this in Gary's best interest?
|
And why do you consider him as GUILTY a priori?
Have you inspected "the damgead computers"?
Begging your pardon, but
I think you do take this position because of a wrongly understood patriotism.