[Allie]

I don't disagree with any of the opinions stated so far. As I said in my earlier post - all things are possible.However, the one thing that I can't quite reconcile is the logistics. Thus far, what we've done is to isolate each section of the 'accident/murder' into compartments. What is missing - at least for me - is the bringing together of a grand plan in its totality.. Now - I don't necessarily have an all-encompassing ability to work out a grand plan myself - but how would someone who wanted her out of the way (and let's include the satanic rite side of it) work it out and have it all swing into action at very short notice - given her erratic nature and the apparant fact that her plans on that day were changing all the time. It's easy to say 'well, they have ways' - but what specific ways? When someone's plans are known in advance - say, like Kennedy - there's no real logistics to consider. But with Diana this doesn't appear to be the case.Believe me, I'm not dismissing anything here. I'm perhaps playing Devil's Advocate,* trying to run it altogether in terms of its logistics. What sort of advanced warning would anyone need to have a reasonable chance of killing her? It all seems to hinge on 'ifs' and 'buts'. IF she goes to Paris, IF she keeps to a plan, IF all the crew required (and that includes ambulance crews and so on) are on hand, given her changes of plan.These thoughts only came to me after hearing a famous crime writer analyse the feasibilities. Hence my own questions.