Quote:
Originally Posted by weareone
My question is... How do you balance the output of suplying uncensored information against negative ouput. i.e if we are all co-creating our future via our expressed emotions, should we be listening to people such as bill deagle stating negative posibilities for the future into the mass conciousness (such as the death of the soul) that would put some viewers into the 'fear vibration'?
P.s i dont have any issues against bill deagle in particular thats just the most recent example i came accross. Keep up the incredible work.
My thanks and blessings in anticipation of your answer, and taking the time out of your busy schedule. Love and light, peace.
|
I hope you don't mind if I repeat our statement from 13 November on the Camelot 'What's New' home page:
Our view is that refusing to look at reality will not help... and then, from that standpoint of being WILLING to look at reality, we causatively create the future we want.
In other words, to travel there, we have to depart from where we are, and we have to KNOW WHERE WE ARE to make that journey. Robert Fritz, the founder of
DMA (and the author of
The Path of Least Resistance) talks extensively about this.
If we refuse to speak the name of the beast, the beast will do whatever it wants. We are not afraid of the beast... and we are not afraid to speak its name. That is not the same as invoking it, supporting it, or being responsible for its existence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreb13
Bill, I have a quick question regarding T1V83 and Hillary Clinton. In a post here on Avalon back in September 2008, you had this to say:
Quote:
|
If there is a weird twist of fate and circumstances somehow conspire (or people conspire!) to enable Hillary to be on the ticket after all - then head for the hills, because we will be in trouble. The probailty of this, though, looks very low indeed. It's not zero - because weird things CAN happen - but may be less than 1%.
|
It seems now that Hillary Clinton is going to be Obamas Secretary of State. ( http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008...etary-of-state)
Do you see this bad news??
--------------------------------------
another tidbit:
Quote:
The nature of timelines is such that - especially at the moment (if that's not too subtle a twist of the English language) - they are rather like a braided rope, composed of several different tangled strands. One 'strand' can influence an adjacent one if it is too 'close'.
In practice, this means that there can be an apparent diversion from a timeline, and (rather like pulling off a Freeway to a rest area and then rejoining the Freeway again) one can later find oneself back in the 'main flow'.
|
Hopefully we're not back on the same "freeway" again.
Thanks again Bill and Kerry for all that you do! |
Great questions - and smart ones, too.
Hillary Clinton was never going to retire from politics! So it's hardly surprising that she may have a key role in the new administration. We had heard from several sources that it was still possible that Hillary might yet - by a freak of circumstances worthy of an extreme Hollywood movie script - emerge as President. But as time rolls on (or as this timeline rolls on!) this does seem more and more clean impossible.
Regarding whether or not we're on the same freeway, this is a moot point. It SEEMS as if we're on a new one. We had 14 separate, strong data points that indicated that something was going to happen in October (now passed) - beyond the financial collapse that we had been told was going to happen earlier this year. Nothing did.
We may still be in a dangerous period (up to the 20 January inauguration and maybe beyond), but as more and more time passes with no attack on Iran or pandemic outbreak, the more we are relaxing (just a little).
But we have been specifically informed that
"all bets are off" regarding which timeline we are now on. We seem to be in uncharted territory, unexplored by any time portal devices we're aware of. Our current stance is that we will know a huge amount more by next summer, 2009.
This may or may not be good news... we will have to see. One important source, which we have not yet published, insists that worldwide defensive preparations are still being made against a possible catastrophic event sometime after 2012. This information comes with the caveat (from the inside) that apparently no-one knows for sure what will happen... not even the ETs.
[to be continued]