Quote:
Originally Posted by starman
Any updates on Gordon Novel and the RAM group? In the PC interview he said that they will begin massproducing energy devices at the end of this decade. How is that going?
|
We're in regular touch with Gordon Novel, and last spoke with him just a week ago. His project is continuing. It's complex, and there's a heavy funding requirement (which may now be solved), and he has quite a team working with him. This is all we can say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphi
with appreciation and gratitude for everything you and Kerry do, can I ask if I have missed on PC whistleblower testimony about chemtrails, and if it's not on PC already, is there anything you can release that satisfies your 90% credibility rating without compromising your sources.
it just seems to me that it must be a large operation to spread chemtrails and somebody involved must have doubts about what they are doing.
best wishes
|
We were specifically told by our source
Hawkeye that this Rense article here on chemtrails was very accurate.
http://rense.com/general79/chem.htm
(See the report on
http://projectcamelot.org for 24 April this year.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacqui D
All your work has been greatly appreciated Bill and Kerry and i for one wish to thank you for opening this site.
Whilst i know there has been many conflicts ,there have been many positive connections with some lovely people.
I would like to thank you again for making that possible.
  
|
Thank you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghglenn
Hey Bill,
I too want to thank you for all the work you guys are doing. I have to say
that from all the information that has been provided, both from Camelot and from Avalon, that the HPH stuff from Cliff and George seems the most tactile.
You come across as someone who really looks at the "nuts and bolts" of things.
Do you feel that their "science" is good? The reason I ask is that I have become very skeptical of prophets/channelers of late, not that they aren't receiving a message, just that those messages may be tainted, especially now.
Obviously, we all know the economy is gonna tank, change is on the horizon, etc.
I just want to know what is "resonating" with you?
Thanks
|
We do agree with Clif that all people are psychic to a degree, but few realize it. Therefore the web is a great place to look to discover patterns of future events that are no consciously known yet.
The problem lies in the interpretation (as Clif readily admits). A string of words, archetypes or themes still needs to be connected together to form a narrative that makes sense in the real world - and this may not be obvious till after the event.
Sometimes we feel Clif does retrospectively stretch an interpretation to "make it fit". But at other times he does seem to be very accurate. The forecast dates of the growing financial crisis - and how the 'bubble' burst on 7 October - were pretty much spot on.
But at the moment - so far! - we've not seen the other events which seemed to be accompanying this, and the 'release language' which was set to last for nearly five months (rather than a couple of weeks as with 9/11) does not (yet) seem to be related to an event of similar magnitude.
We may have to wait and see. We've been specifically told that some major events may have been prevented from within the military or intelligence agencies, although this is by definition almost impossible to prove. And we've also been told that the period of time up to Obama's inauguration on 20 January is "especially dangerous".
We too are skeptical of channelers (it was always clear to us that Blossom Goodchild's Oct 14 event was never going to happen, and nor was Dr Boylan's November asteroid impact).
Bill Deagle's alarming vision of a nuclear event was NOT set for 7 October (as many have misunderstood) - and was sufficiently vivid for this to have been a real event which either has not yet happened, or which happened/happens on a different, parallel timeline... but not to us on this one.
We don't know how best to interpret this, but it was certainly real enough for the man to be severely shaken to the point of being barely able to talk. In our view, anyone who has an experience this impactful deserves to be heard.
[to be continued]