Quote:
Originally Posted by Antaletriangle
You stated that there have been MIINTERPRETATIONS of the press-why did the press mention Guantameno initially,what is there to interpret?As soon a Guantanemo is mentioned by the press then that's the fear factory in full swing-let the wolves encircle waiting for the fear to produce a "good story".
They dine from the same plate.
http://security.itproportal.com/arti...dition-appeal/
NASA hacker Gary McKinnon has lost his appeal at the High Court against his extradition to the US to face a trial by prosecutors who allegedly told him he "would fry". McKinnon's lawyers will seek leave to appeal to the House of Lords.
McKinnon hacked into US military and NASA computers in 2001 and 2002 and admitted to the incident when arrested in November 2002. He was told by UK prosecutors that he faced community service, but US prosecutors sought his extradition.
Prosecutors in the US have said they believe McKinnon could be jailed for 70 years, could face a military and not a civil court and could even be interred at Guantanemo Bay.
If that isn't scaremongery by the press reports!?
or this:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...h_hacker_.html
UK hacker Gary McKinnon is getting a lot of play out of America's (sadly, well-earned) international reputation for bypassing due process and ignoring human rights in the War on Terror. |
These exaggerations come from Gary's side...and then are reported in the press.
It is a lie that Gary faces a MILITARY tribunal, it is a lie that Gary is to be treated as an enemy combatant, it is a lie that Gary would be held in Guantanamo, it is a lie that Gary faces 70 years, given US sentencing guide lines.
Gary is supporting lying.
Gary would support anything in the name his own self interest