Quote:
Originally Posted by martian31v
the obama team should be sympathetic to gary's case, because it represents a response (by gary) to an injustice perpetrated by factions within the U.S govn. yes, a president or any other rational/honest being should justify gary's actions for the reasons stated in the argument below. you know, the argument you tried to refute, but failed.
|
There you go with the "shoulds" again. So Obama should be sympathetic to a guy who hacked into military computers? If he were so foolish as to express sympathy for a man who endangered "national security" it would guarantee that he wouldn't win another election. He even had to publically disavow his friendships with his more radical FRIENDS in order to win the election, so I'm sure he won't have much trouble ignoring an unknown hacker from the UK.
It doesn't matter if he's sympathetic or not, a president does not control as much as you seem to think he does. In fact, he will be part of the established order and the agenda of the true PTB (which does not include a temporary president), whether he likes it or not. If he didn't know that before he sought the office of president, he will surely know it soon.
Nancy