im with rebel4life on this.
george green and the paradigm books tell you to do something to help bring about a change in mass consciousness and a new age. it takes work, inward and outward, to accomplish this.
to me, it seems that wilcock feels that it will just happen on its own, regardless of what anyone does. i dont understand how a goal can be met by doing nothing. i recall him say in a PC interview that if 51% of your essence is good, youll reach ascension. jeez, i think almost everyone is 51% good. whats the whole point of waking up and spreading the word and changing yourself for the better if ascension just "happens" anyway? hes too complacent about it. i feel like its okay to sit on ones ass and do nothing since ascension will just happen.
second, wilcock seems to think that there wont be any kind of chaos/catastrophe and if there is, so what. i think there
has to be chaos and catastrophes in order to bring about change at this point. sure, its bad to manifest it in our thoughts, but its reality. we are past the point of change without a mass chaotic period. we have to realize that there will be bad times ahead and that it is neccessary. we can then focus on how we will restructure society.
third, he was pretty high on the president elect of the US. i dont want to discuss it further, as weve beaten this dead horse enough.
david, in this update, talks about how hes enjoying pf changs food and xylitol gum. aside from the MSG in the chinese food, whats he doing chewing aspartame- laden gum? of course the guy is allowed to eat what he wants, but what good is being on his "no fruit no sweet diet" if youre eating those excitotoxins? to me, it comes off as being uneducated. i dont expect him to be as hardcore about his diet as me, but aspartame is a no brainer. chapter 32 in the
new paradigm handbook ought to be reread by him.
lastly, george green seems to think that wilcock is under the influences of the dark powers (i think i recall kerry asking him in an interview and he said that). im not sure if thats true or not, but its still a piece of evidence, however weak it is.
i also agree with truth voice 2012 with his assertion that wilcock took a mean spirited swipe at deagle, although that was more of a personality flaw than a flaw with the mans work.
support green or wilcock... or both. as long as you have the right frame of mind with what will happen. thats whats mainly important.
for the record:
if any wilcock supporters have found anything ive stated to be false about the man, im more than willing to alter my views of him. ive been wrong before.
