[Mike_Jetson]

Im pleased DW touched on the Obama stuff again as its been stressing me out somewhat lately. Lets face facts, one of them is going to get the nod, at least if we know we cannot get someone else in and we know we cant change the system this time around then we should really decide who is the least painful option. I say Obama.

And Im pleased somebody brought up the JFK issue. Even if you assume Obama doesnt know enough, that doesnt mean he wont be found and taught the truths by a white knight on the inside. Ive avoided voicing my preference to other people but I have to admit that listing to DW again about this has made me think its worth a shot, if at least to make some effort in reducing chances of McCain getting in.

And I can see some peoples point who have issues with DW. He did cover way more ground than I was expecting, a bit like the david Icke by election speech but Wilcock is only giving us what he currently believes. Our beliefs change all the time. These whistleblowers and insiders statements shouldnt be treat as written in stone. Give them a break, they are telling us what they believe, they are not trying to convert us to anything, just what they know and believe.

I for one am very thankful for such postive messages. And yes, someone said he may have over simplified things with the Rocks Vs Roths scenario and obviously its more complicated but when you talk to some friends about things and you tell them 9/11 was an inside job and they ask you who exactly did it....you cant just give them a list of names....only an overall picture of belief backed up with certain facts and/or experiences and research. Stay positive