Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - Mombasa Inman seeking asylum and offers proof Obama not a U.S. citizen

THE eXchanger · 11-12-2008, 08:13 PM

quite interesting :

Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

Obama [or his lawyer(s)] MUST respond no later than 1 DEC to the SCOTUS-granted Writ of Certiorari.

VERY, VERY FEW writs of this type are ever granted by SCOTUS.

This writ was granted due to some very compelling reasons - the number one reason hinges on whether Obama is Constitutionally elibible to hold the office of POTUS.

Obama MUST respond NLT 01DEC08.

Obaama has two options in his response.

1. Tell the SCOTUS to take a flying leap by repeating his non-response to the federal court in PA or by asking for dismissal.

This is NOT a viable option for Obama to take. Remember your elementary, high school and college-level “Government 101″ class education on the three co-equal branches of our government. Would Obama dare to tick-off deluxe the currently Conservative majority in the SCOTUS? He might, but, again, that course of action is highly inadvisable. I can conceive that should Obama flip the court the bird that the SCOTUS would then hold Obama in contempt and subpoena his vault birth certificate from the State of Hawai’i. Then the fight would really be on.

2. Comply and provide exactly what is requested of him in the Writ.

Obama is between a rock and a hard place IF there is no legal proof that he was born in Hawai’i. Evidence and legal proceedings to date strongly indicate that this is the fact of the matter.

This issue is no longer a Berg vs. Obama legal issue. On the contrary, it is now and for all intents and purposes a SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES versus Barack Obama legal issue.

11-12-2008, 08:13 PM	#3
THE eXchanger Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Spiritual eXplorer-Canada Posts: 4,915	Re: Mombasa Inman seeking asylum and offers proof Obama not a U.S. citizen quite interesting : Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted. http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm Obama [or his lawyer(s)] MUST respond no later than 1 DEC to the SCOTUS-granted Writ of Certiorari. VERY, VERY FEW writs of this type are ever granted by SCOTUS. This writ was granted due to some very compelling reasons - the number one reason hinges on whether Obama is Constitutionally elibible to hold the office of POTUS. Obama MUST respond NLT 01DEC08. Obaama has two options in his response. 1. Tell the SCOTUS to take a flying leap by repeating his non-response to the federal court in PA or by asking for dismissal. This is NOT a viable option for Obama to take. Remember your elementary, high school and college-level “Government 101″ class education on the three co-equal branches of our government. Would Obama dare to tick-off deluxe the currently Conservative majority in the SCOTUS? He might, but, again, that course of action is highly inadvisable. I can conceive that should Obama flip the court the bird that the SCOTUS would then hold Obama in contempt and subpoena his vault birth certificate from the State of Hawai’i. Then the fight would really be on. 2. Comply and provide exactly what is requested of him in the Writ. Obama is between a rock and a hard place IF there is no legal proof that he was born in Hawai’i. Evidence and legal proceedings to date strongly indicate that this is the fact of the matter. This issue is no longer a Berg vs. Obama legal issue. On the contrary, it is now and for all intents and purposes a SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES versus Barack Obama legal issue.