Quote:
Originally Posted by GregorArturo
First, E=MC^2 is based on mass relative to gravity. Gravity is not based on mass. Gravity is based on the rotary spin of an object, specifically an atom, but also applies on the macro level say with a flying saucer or a planet. When the planet spins, it forms an axis which generates your poles and a magnetic field. If you are referring to dark matter (anti-matter), then that is your torsion fields that are generated by this rotary spin, the so called graviton those dumb ass physicists are searching for while they play god with the LHC.
BTW, I just made another major breakthrough that explains and unearths patterns in Earth's frequency structure, no pun intended. Including the Solfeggio frequencies and the pyramids. Just need to work out some equations. Stay tuned...
|
Gregor, check out Nassim Haramein:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...99791256390335
He shares your "dumbass physicists" belief. I think you two are completely on the same path, but it seems your views are slightly different on dark matter and gravity. His work on the unified field theory and sacred geometry of the tetrahedron, while paired with your work could be quite significant. I have no doubt all of this mathematically ties together nicely. I think what his work lacks you make for and vice versa. The video is long but flows nicely, enjoy.