Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post

orb · 11-11-2008, 02:36 PM

Well, we need 250 feet not 200. That 50 feet is really important, and I would back on 300 personally for safety.

This post has NOTHING to do with global warming, I am not sure why people are reading it that way. This post is concerned with one thing. The flip of the poles and the placement of Antartica on the Equator, and placement of Greenland not much further away, in a position of sunlight that they completely met.

If you do not think there is a possibility of a pole flip, check out info in Greenland and the Wolly Mammoth.

In other words, the glaciers in the current position are because of the pole flip, and without the 23.5 degree tilt of the planet there might not even be glaciers. So glaciers are not native to the planet. Mark Kimmels alens contact claim they are going to corrent the 23.5 degree tilt in the next 2 months and take the moon away as well That would be interesting.

11-11-2008, 02:36 PM	#15
orb Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Edmonton, Alberta Posts: 138	Re: New Landmass Map Project Well, we need 250 feet not 200. That 50 feet is really important, and I would back on 300 personally for safety. This post has NOTHING to do with global warming, I am not sure why people are reading it that way. This post is concerned with one thing. The flip of the poles and the placement of Antartica on the Equator, and placement of Greenland not much further away, in a position of sunlight that they completely met. If you do not think there is a possibility of a pole flip, check out info in Greenland and the Wolly Mammoth. In other words, the glaciers in the current position are because of the pole flip, and without the 23.5 degree tilt of the planet there might not even be glaciers. So glaciers are not native to the planet. Mark Kimmels alens contact claim they are going to corrent the 23.5 degree tilt in the next 2 months and take the moon away as well That would be interesting.