Quote:
Originally Posted by Corky
Hi Deoxyan
First of all, great thread. I think the Bronte Baxter (Splinter in the mind) blog is very thought provoking.
Before commenting, I thought I would try to find a good definition of what I think the ego is being defined as:
http://www.kriyayoga.com/english/encyclopedia/ego.htm
But, after reading that I feel that the ego helps us translate our earthly experiences to our spiritual plane and I feel that is needed for balance. I need my heart (soul) and my mind (ego) to function as a whole person. It is all about balance in the here and now; before we can even get close to the Divine within.
Unconditional Love and Oneness are the product of a balanced human experience and being that we don't yet reside in the ethereal world, how can we ascertain that balance without the mind (ego)?
It is all very ponderous and I know just enough not to be inflexible in my opinion. |
i think we are that god who decided it got bored of being alone in his great "divinity" and then we appeared. Seems, the only difference beween that god and us is the amnessia we have, on purpose.
Amnessia can make you forget who you are so, great for that to be done, the plan of god.
Well, i never use the word god, i use the word source. We are the source under amnessia, probably. We came to be what we are because it was pointless to be the source without amnessia because that cannot exist, it can only exist under the conceptualizations we make, and speculate about, as far as i know, from our external dimensional coordinates of reference we have, the
ego. Internally, we are the source, externally, all that you perceive, even your spirit, emotions, and thoughts, those all are external features of your dimensional location now.
for me all this suppositions only are logical conclusions, but, i don´t think that is all there is, or all there it can be.