Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Quadir
Can you provide clear evidence for this? As far as I know Obama received most of his money by private contributions from the people. So it would seem much more likely to me to call him "Bought and paid for by the people, to make a change..." And seriously, that kind of money and that kind of support would make it possible.
So why is it one way and not the other?
I think we should be realistic about our expectations. But that goes either way... Unless there is evidence that clearly puts the man in league with the NWO we should not assume he is... Unless there is clear evidence that places him outside those circles we should not assume he is fully outside.
With all the confusion we're creating ourselves by stating gut feelings as facts we don't need an NWO to confuse us even more.
|
My feelings exactly brother