I understand what you are saying, but extradition does not mean conviction.
Gary should NOT have admitted his guilt, but he did.
Gary, I am sure you will feel better when this is behind you.
Get it over with, and go back to having a life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGhost
"Gary has has due process in his extradition process"
Really?? Because the Extradition Act 2003 does not require the US authrorities to provide the British courts with ANY evidence before demanding the extradition of a British citizen.
This is part of the fast-track extradition "treaty" between the US & Britain which was only signed by the British side and not the Americans (so not really a treaty, then).
The Extradition Act 2003 constitues TREASON by the British government, in my humble opinion, as it favours the interests of a foreign government over the interests of British citizens.
Would you like it if you faced extradition to Britain with no evidence of an alleged crime being presented by British authorities at your court hearing?
How does one defend themselves when the prosecution is not required to provide evidence? The claim of a crime is now enough for British citizens to be extradited to the US.
|