Respectfully, I would ask how anyone truly 'knows' anything at all.
As I said in a previous post, it is all very well using the term 'Sheeple' to describe anyone who proposes an opposite view, but unless you are able to shape-shift, become a fly on the wall of the private meetings of those in power and hear the words yourself, you are forced to rely on the evidence of one theorist or another. Is that not also following a leader?
Again, respectfully, I ask why, when Blossom, Bill D. or others make predictions which are seized upon so avidly - and fail to materialise - those who have happily applied 'Sheeple' to others, do not then see the parallels that exist?
If Obama is the anti-Christ, why are those who believe it unhappy? Surely if the anti-Christ is a precursor of the coming of the Christ, Obama would just make this a step nearer?
Take the information on board by all means, but don't be blind to the fact that it's possible to slip behind any leader - even if you think you aren't.
In my opinion, awareness is wise - but negativity isn't going to get us very far.
