Quote:
Originally Posted by 777 The Great Work
The universe is based on harmonic series such as 72, 144, 432. And 144 (a "C" tone in hertz) is a perfect harmonic of the speed of light, which is 144,000 nautical miles (144,000 minutes of arc per Earth grid second) in the vacuum of space.
Each of these harmonics are literally a mirror, or a cascade of mirrors within mirrors, that 8 hz can look into. For example 144 is 18 x 8 hz, and 72 is 9 x 8 hz.
The way that light travels in space is thus a 144 decimal harmonic (144:144,000), and if you multiply 144 three times one obtains the archaic 432.
|
Wow, very interesting. Thank you. So, using natural harmonic ratios to surmise what note 432 might be, I would conclude that since 432 is 3 times 144 then it is the 3rd partial of the note that represents 144, which we have decided is "C". The 3rd partial of a note is an interval of a perfect 12th in western notation and a perfect 12th up from "C" is "G". So, 432 should be represented by "G". It is very interesting that our music system is evenly divided into 12 parts (chromatic scale has 12 notes, the 12th note being a doubling of the 1st) and that stacking perfect 12ths takes you through the entire spectrum of possible notes in such a system. 144 is 12x12. Hmmm...
I wanted to address 777Great about 8hz being the "lens" with which we look into the harmonic mirror. I have independently had a similar thought with the exception for a possible inclusion. 8hz is a power of 2hz. The relationships that you used as an example of the power of 8 (144 is 18 x 8) can easily be shown to have significant relationships to other powers of 2. For example:
144 is 18x8
144 is 36x4
144 is 72x2
144 is 9x16
Note that 9, 18, 36, and 72 are all octave reductions of our original "C" at 144. So I would expand the intuition that 8 is an important method of magnifying focus, to the idea that 2, or more accurately the bi-polar nature of our experience of waves is an essential tool for focus, magnification, and description. It's interesting that 9x2 gives 18, which translates into 18 cycles per second, where as 9x4 gives 36, or 36 cycles per second, the 'same' pitch an octave 'higher'. So as the power of 2 increases, the amount of detail in the wave sample increases. By the time we hit 144 we've multiplied the original "pure" ratio of 9/1 by 4 times the power of 2 (not sure if that's how you would state it, but we've magnified our source by 2^4). As I get further into this, I'm almost certain that calculus plays a role in accurately describing this phenomena, but I'm pretty rusty on my calc skills.
I used the word bi-polar because it's very interesting to me that 2 allows all of this to happen in the way that we perceive it. There are always two states to a given wave, even if you are dealing with a frequency like 9hz, because there is always a positive and a negative state and its the time that it takes for the wave to transition from one state to the next that we measure. So the relationship between the 2 states essentially defines the wave, i.e. "This is a gamma ray because it takes blah amount of time for it to transition from positive to negative, and that time measurement is within the range of the spectrum we call gamma rays." That's pretty interesting.
However my presumption that a wave has 2 states is based on the method by which we generally model waves and NOT on the phenomenon of waves themselves. Although, all waves have Max energy instances and Min energy instances, which we describe as the positive peak and the negative peak respectively (max and min), all waves that we observe in nature exhibit multiple dimensions of energetic and material modulation. In other words a sound wave travels by means of expanding and shrinking (compression), but in between its most expanded state and it most compressed state, there are multiple moments of "turn around", where the wave has not peaked, but it begins to shrink any way, and instead of going all the way down to equilibrium, it begins to expand again (hence neither of these turn-arounds representing a peak in either direction). Even though the wave may be abstractly described as a 36hz or 144hz wave, there were actually many instance of state change between the peak changes that we use to describe the wave. And these changes can be measured, allowing us to distinguish a 144hz wave embedded in a 432hz wave, or alternately a 432hz wave embedded in a 9hz wave. So what's my point? That all waves have many, many defining states that represent multiple dimensions of state change or better put, "All physical waves are multi-dimensional modulations of a given medium".
In addition to that, all waves can be seen to exist in multiple mediums. The sound wave in that last example is generally described as the compressing and decompressing of physical matter, however when any matter is compressed, the heat energy around that matter changes and also when the heat energy changes the state of compression changes. So movement by means of compression produces movement in heat, but we generally describe heat as a form of electromagnetic energy. So the change in heat state that results from the change in pressure can be described as an electromagnetic wave, which means that our sound wave is not only navigating the medium of vibratory changes in matter, but also the medium of vibratory changes in energy. And just as the sound wave is generating additional sound waves because it is operating on multiple dimensions of material state change, it's electromagnetic portion is generating additional electromagnetic waves because it is operating on multiple dimensions of energetic state change.
If you haven't noticed by now I'm just ranting. Every time I think of something new to say, if I start actually typing it out, I immediately realize something new to say. So I will try to wrap up here.
All of the mediums of state change are completely interlinked. A change in electron charge produces a change in magnetic charge which produces a change in gravitational charge which produces a change in the state of some as yet undiscovered or theoretical force and so and so on. So all the disciplines that deal with any form of continuous state change are completely relevant to one another, because all types of waves are simultaneously existing as all other types of waves. A single wave exerts pressure to change state on all other waves, on all levels of magnification and in all dimensions of state change, and in turn, all other waves exert pressure upon that single wave. That's extremely interesting to me.
This also means that all waves are multi-spectrum and therefore it is impossible that they consists of only 2 dimensions, although it would be accurate to say that you need at the very least 2 dimensions to describe a given wave. 1 dimension does not allow you to describe anything about a wave form. At the same time, the more dimensions you have, the more accurate your description gets. This calls into question our practice of magnifying wave patterns by use of the powers of 2, which are based on a 2 dimensional description of the wave.
Take a wave that travels through space for example. It moves through 3 dimensions of time and one dimension of space according to Newtonian physics. Lets go with that, but we need to refined the language. This is because the way we actually describe a 3D wave is by mapping state changes in each of the 3 spatial dimensions as a function of time. So what you really have as a description is 3 pairs of bi-polar waves which are used to describe what is in fact a single multi-dimensional wave. We prefer to measure the 2d abstraction of the waves that we measure and describe, hence the apparent bi-polarity.
At the basic level that I've study this stuff, each of these pairs is treated as being independent from the other two. Does that make sense to anyone else. Given that a material state change enacts an energetic state change, wouldn't it make more sense to assume that a change in one spatial dimension will induce a change in all other spatial dimensions? Maybe this is how the real physicists study....hehehe, I obviously never made it to multi-variable calculus.
So if a wave that we had been treating as a 2 dimensional phenomenon turns out to be multi-dimensional, why are we still using powers of 2 as a method of magnification and exploration. Would 3 or 7 or 12 be more accurate--anything that attempts to treat this wave as more than a bi-polar phenomena will probably deliver a more accurate description of the behavior of a wave.
Ok, I'll just stop there.