Quote:
Originally Posted by tobiwan
It was comet NEAT (C/2002 V1).
And he said that the nucleus of it was twice the size of jupiter, and it's coma grew to the size of the sun, it's tail was nearly 1AU long.
|
Comet NEAT was a one shot deal... the only reason it became bright for a short time was because it was hit by a Coronal mass ejection. Other wise it was a small insignificant object... I do not see what it has to do with Nibiru
Comet C/2002 V1 (NEAT) is a non-periodic comet that appeared in November, 2002. The comet appeared with a magnitude of approximately –0.5, making it currently the 7th brightest comet seen in 70 years.[1] It was seen by SOHO in February 2003. It was calculated that the comet came closer to the sun than the Asteroid belt in September 2002.[2] (Slight controversy arose when the comet failed to break up when it approached the sun, as expected by some scientists if it were a small comet.[3])
The comet was hit by a Coronal mass ejection during its pass near the sun[4]; some rumoured it had "disturbed" the sun, but mainstream scientists dismissed this notion.[3] After the comet left LASCO's field of view around February 23, an object was seen at the bottom of the images. Although technicians dismissed this as a glitch, rumours persisted that the comet had been expelled from the sun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C/2002_V1_(NEAT)
Amazing Live Images: Sungrazing Comet Possibly Hit by Solar Eruption
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ho_030218.html
Brightest comets seen since 1935
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/icq/brightest.html
I really wish everyone would stop looking at every event out in space and claiming "OH THAT MUST BE NIBIRU.."
All that does is make any serious attempt at research ridiculed.
Since the first person who ever mentioned Nibiru to the wolrd was Sitchin... all the other works are based off Sitchins work... Since Sitchin's work is based ONLY on his own interpretation of Ancient Sumerian... all other works since are merely based on an unsubstantiated premise...
...