View Single Post
Old 10-31-2008, 02:00 PM   #44
dataeast
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 114
Default Re: ULTRA ALTERNATIVE 9/11 theory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by feeler View Post
In the absence of the above listed criteria, should we be convinced that the planes (and the plane crashes) that we saw were real?
First, you should reframe the question originally posed (by ad.johnson) with relevant data before jumping to any conclusions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by feeler View Post
John Lear already pointed out that the video/photos of the 9/11 planes are suspect due to the missing navigation lights (which we should have seen).
They are not evident in these photos either, which are more appropriate due to the position of the sun (time of day).
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Chile...-ER/1410483/M/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-I...-ER/1400588/M/
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Air-C...-ER/1400126/M/

Also, the photos for comparison where taken too late in the day to be compared with the video of the event.

Learn how the aperture, gain and shutter speed of CCD (video cameras) influence the moving images in video. The resolution of the video presented would not even capture lights under those conditions even if they were on.

Learn how aperture, shutter and film speed (ISO) influence photographs.
dataeast is offline   Reply With Quote