[feeler]

Originally Posted by dataeast

In short...

Not enough parameters for any equations concerning kinetic energy and mass.

No dimensions or thickness of steel plate in hollow steel sections.

No volume or description of aircraft fuel. No analysis of combustion or kinetic energy of blast.

In the absence of the above listed criteria, should we be convinced that the planes (and the plane crashes) that we saw were real?


John Lear already pointed out that the video/photos of the 9/11 planes are suspect due to the missing navigation lights (which we should have seen).




For your comparison:





-feeler