...been keeping an eye on this thread. So far the comments seem generally ok. A few things come to mind,
It is nice to see that some people can read the materials provided by Judy Wood and look at the evidence. It has always been amazing how the loudest voices of the 9/11 truth groups chose to ridicule her, considering how they were ridiculed by the general American public, on pretty much the same grounds. At first I thought the 9/11 truth community would be rather enlightened. And many individuals are, but the loudest voices seem stuck at a certain level of understanding.
There are really two aspects to the 9/11 truth phenom. Those that seek all knowlege and perhaps certainty of how it happened. And those concerned with disseminating basic knowledge directly to the public. The general trend is that she is ridiculed by the later.
A large amount of evidence is available to actually establish the truth of one particular theory or another, as well as names of those involved. In the end, or even the beginning, the exact details do not matter on a societal level. Once the 'inside job' nature of the events is clear, so is the solution.
Of course I do have some opinions and eyewitness info, which I do not generally disclose when interacting with the public. To begin with I would argue in favor of the idea that a high level explosive was used at the initiation of the North Tower implosion, near the top. Probably not a micro-nuke because of radiation readings, but something comparable. Any suggestions?
My reason for thinking that is that i felt a strong shockwave from that blast at a distance of about 3 miles. It is important to note that I was on a rooftop with a clear view and no obstructing windows. The presence of the shockwave was confirmed by another witness present. Pedestrians on the street would not have been in a position to feel it.
Oh, and I took pictures of the explosion at the top of the tower. It really is true that anyone with the ability to see what is in front of them can clearly see the basics of 9/11. For instance, those airplanes were incapable of bringing down the towers. FEMA even admitted that the jet fuel had burned away 5 minutes after impact. The explosive nature of the North Tower's demise is visually obvious. The explanations keep shifting, but at one point the government was saying that these explosions resulted from burning "office materals"!?
While I would not 'argue' in favor of the idea of energy weapons being used that day, it seems likely to me. It was a mix and match kind of operation, big explosions here, little ones there, fake phone calls where needed. Certainty an opportunity to field test new techniques and machines. Also, another eye witness I've known for a few years took a walk down the West Side Highway that morning, among other places. One thing he saw stood out to me. Some of the cars parked there had all the non-metal parts gone. He saw steel belted car tires without the rubber.
That's about it for special trivia I know. If anyone has questions about the North Tower explosion, I could elaborate.
and...
Yo! to CB
i've seen you around the web
