Quote:
Originally Posted by ad.johnson
By studying the evidence, you can move from a "belief" to a conclusion. It's simpler than you think....
1) Newton's 3rd law states "to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
2) Is steel harder than aluminium wing struts?
3) What would happen if a BUILDING travelling 500 miles an hour hit a stationary plane? (What would come off worst)?
|
Based on what you have provided anyone with high school level physics could conclude: compounding logical fallacies resulting in insufficient data to make any conclusion.
In short...
Not enough parameters for any equations concerning kinetic energy and mass.
No dimensions or thickness of steel plate in hollow steel sections.
No volume or description of aircraft fuel. No analysis of combustion or kinetic energy of blast.
Further, unknowingly you have provided two leading questions to which the answers are "Yes" and one claim all of which are irrelevant here. This is the structured of NLP, albeit poorly done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ad.johnson
If you think carefully about these answers - taking what you know about metal, speed and their behaviour, you will conclude that a regular plane CANNOT possibly have caused the holes in the WTC towers.
|
If you think carefully about the above questions they do not in fact have anything to do with the scenario in question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ad.johnson
You don't need anyone or any other information to reach the correct conclusion about this particular issue.
|
Evidently, the layman needs you however. And yes you need a mechanical engineer and a lot more information to draw any conclusion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ad.johnson
You then go on from there and decide what might've happened (now that you have established an important thing that CANNOT have happened).
|
Wrong and contradictory, you haven't established anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ad.johnson
Part of the "journey onward" can involve watching "September Clues"
|
Then google "September Clues Debunked" to make your own mind up instead of someone telling you what the 'correct' conclusion is.
Oh, here it is:
http://truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf
And google video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...LNsNTDCg&hl=en