[chicomarx]

He certainly seemed a little off and in more recent interviews he is totally out of his mind. It is quite clear his old influences are back to his life now.

I certainly belive he is who he says he is and I belive most, if not all, of the testimony he gave to Camelot. Of course I know it all comes from his particular point of view and relates only to what he has had access to, which in his case is a lot, but still not the whole picture. In other words, I don't think he consciously lied to Camelot.

That being said, everyone has to consider that he is a self proclaimed fascist, friends with Berlusconni and the worst people in Italy. Even in his interview to Camelot he kept making references to what he called true (or good) Illuminati. If you pay enough attention you can notice he is particularly vicious against the Jesuits and the Church, but when it comes to attacking the Illuminati, he falters, goes back to attacking the pope or makes excuses.

Further more, he admitted to be still in contact with people in power and even people from the Vatican. He says they were enemies meeting to negotiate, but what honest business could you possibly have with those fellows? The whole thing made me sure he hadn't severed all his ties with the Illuminati and now that he is apparently back under their wing that impression is only reinforced.

Still, I wouldn't attack his testimony, he gave us good and exclusive information, specially in his critique of other testimonies. Exactly because he is so high up, he can identify disinformation very well. At that point I really don't think he was a disinformation agent. He seemed too important to be an agent of any kind, his position is behind the curtains, not meddling along with us common folk trying to derail our investigations. He is an heir, he would have his own agents for that. I think he had an honest falling out with his previous life and started to move away from the Illuminati, so he began with the Revelations. But now after he already made contact and felled back, I wouldn't trust him anymore.

I found particularly interesting how he described the old aristocratic families sharing power with the Vatican through secret societies. He describes the top of the pyramid as the two headed eagle: temporal and spiritual; the pope and the emperor; the false prophet and the anti-christ.

Of course we still don't know who the emperor is. Who is Rex Mundi? Is it the queen of england ridding Aleister Crowley as the Beast who is going to deliver Arthur to the throne of this planet?

Ok, I let my imagination go for a paragraph or two here, but still, his testimony gave a lot of food for though and basically confirmed data I already had.