Quote:
Ummm, I don't know who was aware of this but Mitchell-Hedges lent the skull to a fiend to keep safe while he was away, his friends son however put it up for auction which was what caused Mitchell-Hedges to buy it in an auction making everybody believe he lied and purchased the skull, his friends son refused to take it off auction, causing Mitchell-Hedges to bid for it, it was the only way he could ever get his discovery back...just so you know, everybody seems to be missing that part in their blogs trying to disprove Maya beliefs, which I myself am not to certain of, and I have done my research I do not make blind accusations like a crazy man. I guess the only way to find out will be December 21st, 2012.
Rob O'Brien, Barrie, Canada
October 10, 2008 4:10pm
|
The above comment was written by 'Rob O'Brien' in response to the debunking of the crystal skulls.
There is no proof offered for the assertions made in it at all. No links or documents are provided in support of the theory that "Mitchell-Hedges' son's friend" (or his butler) put the skull up for auction thereby forcing him to buy it back. On the contrary, we are left with the unalterable fact that Mitchell-Hedges made no mention of the skull until 1943 when records show he purchased it from Sotheby's auctions. We are supposed to believe that that is merely a strange co-incidence.