historycircus

Wow.

If the same personal attacks were leveled at David Wilcock, or Michael St. Clair, there would be ten forum pages defending everything they have ever written.

Let's forget the pointless attacks - he is fat, talks quickly, has an ego (the guy holds a Ph.D. in molecular biology and is liscensed to practice medicine - I'd be pretty proud of that too). Let's move on to the biggie.

Deagle is a doom monger. His message makes you feel bad, and inspires fear. What drew you to Camelot and Avalon? Are we here because we all think everything is just fine, and the world is in complete balance? The wars, famines, genocides, and economic collapses of our times are all just naturally repeating cycles of the human condition that will work themselves out? Nope. We're here because we can sense something is terribly wrong with our world. Deagle, and many others, are just outlining their interpretation of what is wrong. The problems won't go away if we quit talking about them. And, if you all want to go the manifestation route, if we collectively consider the absolute horror of a nuke going off in L.A., or a martial law scenario, and collectively despise it, won't that help us collectively avert manifesting such horrific tragedy?

I can't really say I'm at a place right now where I believe that Deagle is Moses's ancestor (not his reincarnate). However, is it any more impossible to believe than Wilcock's existance as the ghost of Edgar Cayce? Bob Dean's adventures in ancient mesopotamia? Phil Schnieder's fire fight with the grays? Billy Meier's backyard parties with the Plaeidians? David Icke's fight against the lizard people?

The real trick with these Camelot interviews and other sources, is to take something of value away from them - or else you will have just wasted your time. Why do anything that does not enrich your existence? Besides, I think that is why Kerry and Bill do the videos - to educate.

I like what Deagle had to say about the nature of spirituality. I think he uses so much of the Bible because it is a beautiful philosophy, is it not? The old and new testaments both exalt love and promote morality. But they have been appropriated by organized religions that evolved as part of power structures; they were organs, or the body, of various states - and in many ways still are, even right here in the U.S. It is the individual relationship with the divine that is the most important for the health of the spirit, all other relationships only add flavor to the experience. That is the one truth that ideally, all people of faith and spirituality can share - as Martha Stewart would say, "and that's a good thing." If the big three monotheistic religions of the world could get together and recognize that, war would all but dissappear from the globe. I thought that was some pretty deep stuff to consider, and that was one of the positive things that I took away from the interview.