If in fact the Indian leadership have their own disclosure agenda, then this might explain some of the reluctance of the Indian government to sign on to the the U.S. Navy's rumored ET disclosure strategy (as described by Dr. Michael Salla below). Previously, Salla's Navy source claimed that India's reluctance was due to religious reasons. However, that never sounded very believable given the syncretic, "polytheistic" Hindu tradition. Politics always sounded like a more likely answer.
http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-80.htm
Source A said that that various nations were either in favor or opposed to a coordinated international disclosure effort. Source A emphasized that the US Navy has always been pro-disclosure and due to its leading role in policy issues concerning extraterrestrial life and the UN meetings, made the US pro-disclosure. The French along with Britain was also in favor of disclosure. Britain, however, asked that the US should lead the effort. Germany, Saudi Arabia and Islamic countries more generally were hostile to disclosure. Source A said India was "impossible to deal with". Military liaison(s) from China attended all the Upstate NY meetings (though not the original February 12 meeting) and said that the US should "pay for disclosure". According to Source A this was a considerable point of contention.