I do like the honesty of this forum, I'm glad I joined.
Regarding the point in hand:
To say that Project Camelot (B&K) is not genuine would surely mean a loss of interest in it, right?
Proof, evidence or convincing argument aside, I am happy to announce myself firmly on Bill & Kerrie's pro integrity campaign.
Almost any one of the WB's testimonies would be enough to keep my attention, so if only one of them is true, it is worth watching for the next truth to be revealed.
Ask yourself this, if you were film/interviewing a whistleblower and wanted to extract the most pertinent information, would you ask questions that Bill or Kerry do not?
This thread I believe, has shown that we can continue to have confidence in project camelot's "dynamic duo" because (if nothing else) of the very lack of evidence that they are anything but genuine.
Their interviewing & film making skills (which I believe is more to do with the cause of this thread) will I'm sure improve the more they get to do them.
However when reporting on this sort of material the content is always going to outdo the quality.
Namaste.
