Old Project Avalon Forum (ARCHIVE) - View Single Post - What do you know about the "Dr. Jonathan Reed Case"?

RSF · 10-22-2008, 01:54 PM

Hi all,
I'd suppose if the man's name was not Reed and he's not a Psychologist as he claimed at the time then there's reason to doubt the story is accurate and possibly untrue. The location of the injury on the back of supposed ebe's head does not make sense to me as Reed's swinging the wood right-handed and even if swung left handed -- he claimed the ebe was facing him when he struck it. So it just seems to me the injury would be far more frontal.

I have not read the book but did notice during the 18 part presentation on YT, it's not him which mentions the NSA or the first visit by Govt Officials or the Dept of Energy's involvement, but his entourage, Ifind this curious. The blinking eyes need a closer look from someone specialized in digital imaging. Lastly, I had the sense he was looking through a standard one-eye viewfinder while throwing-up in the woods, yet the "Obelisk" image stays in the frame. How could anyone throw-up and hold and image seen only through a view finder?

80/20 its a fabrication in my opinion.

RSF

10-22-2008, 01:54 PM	#45
RSF Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Canada Posts: 226	Re: What do you know about the "Dr. Jonathan Reed Case"? Hi all, I'd suppose if the man's name was not Reed and he's not a Psychologist as he claimed at the time then there's reason to doubt the story is accurate and possibly untrue. The location of the injury on the back of supposed ebe's head does not make sense to me as Reed's swinging the wood right-handed and even if swung left handed -- he claimed the ebe was facing him when he struck it. So it just seems to me the injury would be far more frontal. I have not read the book but did notice during the 18 part presentation on YT, it's not him which mentions the NSA or the first visit by Govt Officials or the Dept of Energy's involvement, but his entourage, Ifind this curious. The blinking eyes need a closer look from someone specialized in digital imaging. Lastly, I had the sense he was looking through a standard one-eye viewfinder while throwing-up in the woods, yet the "Obelisk" image stays in the frame. How could anyone throw-up and hold and image seen only through a view finder? 80/20 its a fabrication in my opinion. RSF