Quote:
Originally Posted by elirien
Interesting isn't it? Those questions are still unanswered and undermine imho the whole theory Peter puts out. Shouldn't that be addressed first for the case of reliability or credibility?
|
Hello my friend.
Well, isn't the NOT adressing them, an answer by itself, and now the credibitly and reliability part is on the other side... They claim ressurection so they prove.... 1st that Christ did it, and did it first. (The "Original" so to speak.)
And extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof beyond the 5th.
Quote:
Originally Posted by elirien
Even with the venus project there is this main problem: How could anyone expect to 'convert' the people that scammed the masses with illusionary money (and this is on a world scale because of the IMF and world bank) and systems to suck them dry? I mean the main problem was not the guy who earned a buck working as a waiter anyway. The problem were the people that created centralized banking or banking on itself that prophecied money out of nothing which means energy or resources out of nothing (so that venusian people can understand it as well  just joking). |
Just my opinion, but isn't the first step explaining to ALL people how that money system works.. And I think we are in the middle of that phase... And by giving all the people the information connected to the problem, we might get the critical mass needed to get to the solving of that problem.
First of all: The DEBT they claim you have to them, doesn't exist. It is an illusionary chain around people's necks, that is there as long as people want to believe it is there.
Second of all, There is an honor debt to all the people Non-American that exchanged their lifetime and countries resouces for American Debt bills. That WAS the "Free Lunch".
Your thoughts?