View Single Post
Old 10-17-2008, 04:28 PM   #32
norman
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 118
Default Re: What do you know about the "Dr. Jonathan Reed Case"?

hi all.

5 years ago I was 'blissfully' unaware of any of this sort of stuff and it's only quite recently that I've even heard of the 'Dr JR' case. All the case evidence and all the debunking evidence has hit me all at the same time. It's very intense stuff, on both sides. 'Somebody' is fabricating a lie - and putting a LOT of effort into it.

I'm compelled by all this ferocity against him to go with my gut feeling. It's true!. It's exactly the same feeling I had at the very beginning of my awakening to this whole alien/ufo reality thing when I downloaded a file, by accident, from a file sharing network and first saw with my eyes the photographic images of the document called SOM1-01. I'm sure most of you know the one I mean.

I used be very much into B/W photography and have watched/felt thousands of images 'appear' before my eyes in a developing dish. When I saw the SOM1-01 images for the first time I had a very deep and profound feeling that what I was looking at was absolutely real. As I struggled to read the grainy pages I was shocked and within hours I was even terrified. My whole world-view had taken a 'broadside'. ( still haven't really got over it )

Amongst other convincing factors, Jonathan Reed's account of his experience in the woods resonates with me. He was utterly stunned. And then add to that, what it would feel like, if you'd just murdered someone in a surprise and sudden fight, you were the only person in the world who knew about it and you were struggling to believe it yourself.

As for the debunkers, well. We know, don't we?, that the whole UFOLOGY scene is an information war zone. It's well saturated with 'mechanics' and compromised sheep dogs. As for individuals, I can't say, and if I could, I wouldn't. If disclosure IS on the cards, and 'they' retain control over it, it'll be a disclosure that guides the flock in a predetermined direction of travel. We could all discuss/argue what 'we-think' 'they-think' long into the early hours but 'disclosure' probably means different things to different people.

Don't count on these indications that they are preparing us for news that 'other intelligent life is out there' to lead all the way to FULL disclosure. Ain't gonna happen!. Not THIS side of a total transformation of human life on the planet. Example, I know that Chinese people exist, (please excuse me, if you're Chinese) I've met quite a few of them, they're all over the planet, I can have a perfectly normal chat with my friends about them but I don't know their secrets, least of all their government's secrets or any possible cross-fertilisation between their secrets and 'my' government's secrets.

More to the point, if, before my government had even admitted that anyone other than British subjects existed, I whacked a Russian on the side of the head and chucked him in my freezer,........... think! The secrecy bureaucracy has the same problems as the rest.

Yes, of course I believe Dr Jonathan Reed. Book sales or no book sales. If I believed the mechanics I don't think I would believe any of this stuff at all.

But I do, and because I do, It stands to reason, in my mind, that the rabbit holes go very very deep. After all, I now realise that I've lived my whole life under a deception. We live in a cognitively decapitated society. That took some doing.

norman.
norman is offline   Reply With Quote