Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_Jetson
People calling her a fraud and only doing it for money again seem incredibly narrow minded. Ive barely seen many of her vids. I briefly watched a few about Oct 14th but I mainly read transcripts of hers and other channellers information. After seeing her apology, Im almost fully convinced she is and always has been genuine. For some people to believe this was about money seems a really poor use of their brains. She predicts a mass sighting of a lightship as a lie. When it doesnt happen she would be over. Game over. She knew that and she was confident because herself and many others have persistently asked the source if they are definately coming. I know average joe we've spoken before about there being people with mental problems. I believe most people who channel are channelling and are not imagining it. These people are often are advanced in the field of meditation and other psychic abilities and talents that have been proven and used to provide them an income.
The question for me, which has been the same question all month is that when it doesnt appear, how are we going to find out where the information is coming from. When i first heard that if enough people wanted it to happen it would happen then i created a few images (the independence day one) to create thought among a few people to help. I was in the position of hope but seeing so many other people being completely confident was worrying as I was thinkign ahead to how we will deal with the aftermath of a non sighting.
Instead of blindly throwing accusations around as many many have done (not aiming this at you calling her scitzo) people should be open to the possibility of a certian group/race/entity/black op etc of deliberately placing this message to cause the problems they have among certain people who pick this up. We are only scratching the surface when it comes to understanding the covert mind control/mind altering programs going on now and in the past.
Youd think she was the only one who had channelled this information. These people had barely anything to gain from this. They stood to lose massively and they have. They now want answers, they have lost trust in certain entities and no doubt will be questioning their own recent history and there will be some which wont be able to handle it and will disappear. I dont think BG is one. She will back with more info. It doesnt harm channelling again to find out if 'they' have an excuse. whatever it is it certianly wont be a good one.
Ive seen written items around from a few light workers / mediums / psychics trying to figure out why it never happened. I enjoyed Wilcocks take on it and pleased he came out about his old prophetic work. I understand there will be people there are not actually channelling and have mental issues but certainly not BG and a few others I can think of.
Id say watch this space. Figuring out why, who and how this happened is more important that aggressively attacking people. YOU could be wrong you know.
|
A lot of people called Blossom a hoaxer and a money maker, but to be honest I don't think it was a hoax or a money making scam. I agree with you in so much as I believe she genuinely believed the message she was putting across, but from there is where we diversify.
Yeah I might be wrong but the first conclusion that I make comes from what we know scientifically, and thats mental illness and delusions. Now these things are obviously proven and hence it is so easy for me to conclude that she was suffering from mental delusions, no more no less. Plus, and its hard to put into words how and why, but reading her words BEFORE the event made me think that the things said were too human, too Blossom's imagination. But, like you said, and I agree, this conclusion could be wrong.
But sadly, I don't think I am wrong. The ship never showed mate, she channelled sweet FA. In a nutshell.
It'd be nice to theorise that she was actually channelling but was fed some disinformation by one force or another, but that is going to be almost impossible to prove. How do you even start looking for proof and where? Cos nobody will own up to feeding her disinfo that is for sure.
Somebody somewhere, somehow, needs to find a way of showing that channelling is very real and does in fact work beyond reasonable doubt, before we can start accepting "channelled disinfo" as a valid reason.
Does that sound like a fair view to you?