View Single Post
Old 10-15-2008, 05:24 PM   #6
Shakesbeer
Avalon Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: socal
Posts: 114
Default Re: Noory/Sereda Interview

Very informative interview. I do disagree with some of the assertions made by Sereda about the effect and it's duration. I think he's equating the perceived physical manifestation as proof of potency on something that's theorized to be working on a quantum level(where he himself stated that quantum scientists are happy with a 1% predictability). In which case the law of thermodynamics doesn't necessarily apply such as seen in a dissipating water crystal as it warms up. There really isn't proof either way that the information isn't "stored" on some kind of energetic layer we can't see and the reformation of the water molecules is simple a by product(like exhaust) of an effect that's already in motion.

Not to mention the intention factor. So what if you really think about happy thoughts to your water for hours, who's to say your intention of a quick flip of joy isn't as pure? There doesn't seem to be proof in Matsuro Emoto's work that the EM fields or heat, sound, etc coming off of the body is what causes these effects. In fact I know some of these crystals happened reportedly after words are written on the containers with similar re-organizational effects. So what does that say about intention? I think it's easier then a lot of us make it out to be.

If I had a microscope I would love to see if I can reproduce any part of this experiment as theoretically I don't see why it would need to be "flash frozen". Especially when you hear all these researchers say "the effect can last X long..." which seems to be arbitrary.
Shakesbeer is offline   Reply With Quote