Quote:
Originally Posted by Operator
Hi Steve,
No harm done ... that's why I came in with: "please be careful".
I know what you mean ... it's very difficult to discern the truth between all the pieces ...
I want to raise an interesting question: What would be better ?
1. All evidence supporting each other
2. Some evidence in conflict with other evidence
In case 1 someone can easily fall for a hoax nothing is contradicting, it must be true.
Case 2 however makes it more interesting. Because the contradictions it will make you more sharp. Someone must NOT be telling
the truth ... and why ?
The why question most of the times is the best lead ......
Cheers
|
Hear, Hear, I`ll be honest, I`ve lurked on here for a while and take most of the comments on here with a pinch of salt. I find a lot of the posts on here fantastical, and, would like to say although I am a sceptic. I want to know the truth.