Hi Operator,
Your questions are very valid. I could answer your question "why" with a one word answer. However I apparently have already offended a Barry fan, (which is funny because you said he appeared unstable and got away scot free
) so I won't. Perhaps in a private message!
Best regards,
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Operator
Hi Steve,
No harm done ... that's why I came in with: "please be careful".
I know what you mean ... it's very difficult to discern the truth between all the pieces ...
I want to raise an interesting question: What would be better ?
1. All evidence supporting each other
2. Some evidence in conflict with other evidence
In case 1 someone can easily fall for a hoax nothing is contradicting, it must be true.
Case 2 however makes it more interesting. Because the contradictions it will make you more sharp. Someone must NOT be telling
the truth ... and why ?
The why question most of the times is the best lead ......
Cheers
|