Quote:
Originally Posted by Reveling John
I feel quite blessed by your informed skepticism, Elirien. It will only make the truth more clear for everyone. It is especially appreciated because of the heat you have to take from those who are still unsure of their own truth, and therefore attempt to bully you into believing (is this not what all religions do?).
Having said that, have you read this statement from the zeitgeist movie site?
Maybe this little bit should be posted amongst all the debunker forums so that they can adequately respond.  |
Thank you for your kind words Reveling John. Believe me, I'm just trying to further the debate. I mostly can't get bothered with posts that don't add anything to the debate. Although it sometimes saddens me to see the type of posts that you pointed out. Loved your opinion on religious behavior by the way
I've read that section of their site. I was quite 'enchanted' during the times when I first watched Zeitgeist and that was the time when I read that section.
On that:
- -This is just my opinion- The style in which the q&a is written is awful. I mean it just smells ego and non-debatability. What are these words? They
blindly ask "Where are the 'Primary Sources'?". Let's move on.
- Well we had this very good debate with TranceAM about Thomas Paine right here on this forum:
http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...?t=1700&page=2
- I'm not sure about Massey. One of his books was thrown before me as 'evidence' but I didn't have time to read what this individual wrote. I could use some input on this one since the refutal people have quite the books on this subject (which are non-biblical and some are written by pagan-roman historians). I will check his stuff later on. His wikipedia page doesn't look promising but let's be unbiased.
By the way I found this site (which I had the time to only read briefly). Very interesting stuff on this very subject:
http://www.conspiracyscience.com/art...geist/part-one
Take care. Will look into this tomorrow. It's too late for research