Quote:
Originally Posted by raulduke
I am sorry and I apologize for the way I phrased that. I was sleepy, but that's no excuse. It was antogonistic and does not further this debate in a positive direction.
I noticed that our most recent posts ovelapped somewhat in terms of time, but did you have a chance to read my 4th post in this thread, just above your 2nd and 3rd?
These are the concerns I really hold about Zietgeist Addendum and your original post nivosh.
I really think we are on the same page here regarding the kind of society we would like to live in.
I'm just concerned that what Zietgiest Addendum is proposing, while extremely well meaning, is easily corruptable.
If you meant this honestly, then, I could not be happier.
peace.
|
Thanks for your sincere concern and for urging us to remain wise and vigilant, Member raulduke("I really think we are on the same page here regarding the kind of society we would like to live in.
I'm just concerned that what Zietgiest Addendum is proposing, while extremely well meaning, is easily corruptable.").
We shall do our best.
Regards,
RaKaR
www.futureofmankind.co.uk