Quote:
Originally Posted by TAXMASTER
obviously nobody here has studied the jfk assassination thoroughly or they wouldn't have such wonderful things to say about bill cooper. he used blurry old faded copies of the zapruder film to futher his theory that the driver shot jfk. it was absolutely preposterous. first, any good copy of the film clearly shows the sun shining on the passenger SS man's head is the same glare that cooper claims was a gun. Second, there was a glass partition between the connelys and the fron seat where the secret service sat and if the driver fired a shot, it would have exploded the glass in fact you can see the connellys head bounce against it when the brakes were applied.
i have studied this assassination for 30 years and consider myself competant in the subject and guys like cooper have given "conspiracy theorists" a bad personna. if he twisted the truth in other events like he did with jfk, how can anyone deem him as credible.
Namaste'
|
I am a fan of Cooper's but I am not in agreement with his thesis on the JFK assasination.
However, he was a dedicated man in attempting to get unpalatable truth to ordinary folks. He was talking about the New World Order long before the likes of Jones and Michael Moore were on the scene. His information came from the "inside", as he served with Naval Intelligence and was associated with the De Molay movement as a young man. His association with De Molay may indicate that his family may have a masonic history? (he himself believed he was chosen for intelligence work due to his prior membership of De Molay -they saw him as the "right" kind of person).
I do not believe he twisted the JFK "truth" for his own benefit but I do believe he was wrong in this instance. However, I have never seen the logic in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. This doesn't mean all Cooper's research should be disregarded and his intentions should be admired, in my opinion.
If you have studied the JFK assasination for 30 years, have you concluded that the official explanation is truth or otherwise? If you have concluded "otherwise", how successful have you been in passing on your research to folks at large?
I am genuinely interested as I believe JFK and 9/11 are the best examples to show people that governments lie and deceive (at the very least) to achieve their aims.