Quote:
Originally Posted by trainedobserver
Obviously there wasn't a nuclear event anywhere in the world yesterday. I chalk all this up to the fearmongering faux-reality cottage industry.
Obviously Deagle is bogus. David Wilcock is just as unrealiable because he hasn't picked up on the fact that Dan Burisch is a proven phoney.
http://www.ufowatchdog.com/jrod.html
http://www.ufowatchdog.com/burischdirtbag.html
I don't get it. Why is such significance placed on the opinions of these people when it can be clearly demonstrated that what they are saying doesn't line up with reality? |
I'd be very pleased if Bill Deagle was either incorrect or seeing a real event on a different timeline (which is entirely possible).
But for clarification - and to further help you train your observational skills! - Bill Deagle never said that there would be a major incident on 7 October.
He said [my paraphrase] that the events which would lead up to the major incident would
begin on 7 October.
There are many pointers to the possibility that there may be a major incident in the next few weeks, and Bill Deagle’s vision is just one of them. When I have a little more time it might be helpful for all to list all the anomalies, clues, insider references and logical inferences that an 'October surprise' (and possibly an unpleasant one) may be on the cards.
Kerry and I have received a number of e-mails from people reporting similar visions. One of them was from a military serviceman who wrote his message to us while in tears. He had seen exactly the same thing. Kerry had seen something similar, also - a number of weeks ago.
There seems to be something happening here. There looks to be a very impactful and vivid event -
which may or may not transpire [note the implicit paradox] - and which is capturing many people's attention.
Re Dan Burisch, here I think you also have not been doing your research. Please read this page:
http://projectcamelot.org/dan_burisch_summary.html (My guess is that you did not read this before making your snap judgement. Please let me know if I am wrong.)
Dan Burisch is exactly who he says he is. Do not believe every debunking piece you read on the net. Kerry and I have seen his
bona fides and so has Rob Simone, on stage at the 2008 Laughlin UFO Conference, where he interviewed Dan before a large live audience. I would be interested also to know if you have seen any of our video interviews of Dan.
With very best wishes,
Bill