Quote:
Originally Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN
The burden of proof lays with the producer of Zeitgeist. If he wants to convince skeptics & change peoples minds, he is going to have to be accurate.
|
Burden of proof? Who's trying to prove anything?
If you do not already have some inward suspicion that what you have been trained to believe and the *way things work* is profoundly false, these movies will not prove a damn thing to you.
Zeitgeist and Zeitgeist Addendum are confirmations of what those who resonate with the films feel as an intuitive condemnation of our society. An *intuitive* and *experiential* wisdom that this is not the way things aught to be and that anyone who is attempting to preserve the relevance of existing institutions and societal structures, or of belief systems like *religion*, *scientism*, and *history*, is utterly and dismally out-of-tune with the current wave of reality.
Proof and corroborative evidence are paradigms of a past system of belief.
Experience, what you feel inside, is the new truth and it will necessarily be different for every single entity who has an awareness of this existence.
Down with materialism. Down with abstractionism.
Welcome Experientialism.
What do you FEEL is TRUE?